Table VII.
Median log difference across configurations of bias, interval width, and RMSE of methods described in Section 1.4 versus MITSS, by interval estimates coverage for multivariate X (for all configurations with JSD < 0.3 with only overlapping units).
| Method | Type | Percent | Absolute bias | Interval width | RMSE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MITSS-PS | A | 58 | 0.27 | 0.11 | 0.27 |
| B | 7 | 0.38 | −0.01 | 0.37 | |
| C | 17 | 0.16 | 0.39 | 0.16 | |
| D | 19 | 0.22 | 0.02 | 0.22 | |
| MITSS-15 | A | 72 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| B | 3 | 0.01 | 0.11 | 0.01 | |
| C | 2 | −0.01 | 0.02 | −0.01 | |
| D | 23 | 0.0 | 0.03 | 0.0 | |
| M–N–m | A | 60 | 0.4 | 0.27 | 0.4 |
| B | 8 | 0.54 | 0.14 | 0.54 | |
| C | 15 | 0.3 | 0.5 | 0.3 | |
| D | 17 | 0.36 | 0.06 | 0.36 | |
| M–C–m | A | 59 | 0.4 | 0.27 | 0.4 |
| B | 8 | 0.54 | 0.14 | 0.54 | |
| C | 15 | 0.3 | 0.5 | 0.3 | |
| D | 17 | 0.36 | 0.06 | 0.36 | |
| DR | A | 68 | 0.54 | 1.36 | 0.54 |
| B | 10 | 1.54 | 2.11 | 1.55 | |
| C | 6 | −0.26 | 0.31 | −0.26 | |
| D | 16 | 0.01 | 0.23 | −0.01 | |
| IPW1 | A | 68 | 4.83 | 3.92 | 4.83 |
| B | 12 | 3.86 | 2.89 | 3.86 | |
| C | 7 | 1.97 | 4.70 | 2.21 | |
| D | 13 | 1.63 | 3.09 | 1.71 | |
| FM | A | 60 | 0.49 | 0.43 | 0.49 |
| B | 8 | 0.76 | 0.32 | 0.76 | |
| C | 15 | 0.41 | 0.55 | 0.41 | |
| D | 17 | 0.30 | 0.05 | 0.30 |
Differences are displayed as alternative methods to MITSS.
The types are configurations for which 95% interval estimates has the following coverages characteristics: A, MITSS ≥ 0.9 and Method ≥ 0.9; B, MITSS < 0.9 and Method ≥ 0.9; C, MITSS ≥ 0.9 and Method < 0.9; D, MITSS < 0.9 and Method < 0.9.