Table 1.
Experimental results of MCs detection.
Methods | TP (True Positive) | FPs (False positives)/image |
---|---|---|
Difference-of-Gaussians- (DoG-) based method [13] | 60% | 1.2 |
Image-difference-technique- (IDT-) based method [9] | 70% | 1.5 |
Neural network-based method [20] | 70% | 1.1 |
Wavelet-based method [14] | 75% | 1.5 |
Support-vector-machine- (SVM-) based method [8] | 90% | 1.3 |
Weighted-local-differences-based method [32] | 70% | 1.9 |
Texture-coding-based method [33] | 95% | 4.3 |
Proposed method | 92.9% | 0.08 |