Skip to main content
. 2015 Jan 24;36(5):1908–1924. doi: 10.1002/hbm.22745

Figure 4.

Figure 4

The coactivation connectivity pattern for each subregion and contrast analyses. The whole brain coactivation connectivity pattern for each subregion was obtained using meta‐analytical connectivity modeling (MACM) analyses (thresholded at P < 0.05, cluster‐level FWE‐corrected, cluster‐forming threshold at voxel‐level P < 0.001). To quantify the different coactivation connectivity pattern of each subregion, difference analysis on each pair of connectivity maps was performed to generate voxels that were significantly more likely coactivated with either subregion. [Color figure can be viewed in the online issue, which is available at http://wileyonlinelibrary.com.]