Skip to main content
. 2016 Mar 9;5:304. doi: 10.1186/s40064-016-1936-8

Table 2.

Comparison of ROC and MPM thresholds using logistic regression analysis

Models and predictors OR (95 % CI) p AUC AIC
ROC threshold
 BNP ≥ 116 pg/ml or NTproBNP ≥ 277.5 pg/ml; 8.4 (4.98,14.11) <0.001 0.768 431.63
 Ref = BNP < 116 or NTproBNP < 277.5 pg/ml
Surgery type
 Aortoiliac; Ref = Infrainguinal surgery 2.4 (1.33, 4.37) 0.004
Diabetes
 Yes; Ref = No 2.0 (1.10, 3.54) 0.023
MPM threshold
 BNP ≥ 115.57 pg/ml or NTproBNP ≥ 246.7 pg/ml; 8.5 (5.03, 14.41) <0.001 0.777 430.16
 Ref = BNP < 115.57 pg/ml or NTproBNP < 246.7 pg/ml
Surgery type
 Aortoiliac; Ref = Infrainguinal surgery 2.5 (1.40, 4.60) 0.002
Diabetes
 Yes; Ref = No 2.1 (1.15, 3.71) 0.015

ROC threshold is an indicator variable of BNP and NTproBNP thresholds determined by the ROC curve method (Allison 2012); MPM threshold is an indicator variable of BNP and NTproBNP thresholds determined by the minimum p value method

Ref reference level, OR odds ratio, CI confidence interval, AUC area under the ROC curve