Skip to main content
. 2016 Mar 9;8:50. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2016.00050

Table 4.

F-wave studies in lower extremity nerves.

Parameters SBMA (1) ALS (2) Control (3) P-value
1 vs. 3 2 vs. 3 1 vs. 2
Tibial nerve
Min F latency (ms) 45.06 ± 5.93 45.43 ± 3.91 44.37 ± 2.98 0.815 0.160 0.305
F persistence (%) 94.28 ± 14.07 95.79 ± 15.65 99.92 ± 0.46 <0.001 0.004 0.077
Mean Famp (μV) 411.96 ± 195.71 399.49 ± 299.88 271.87 ± 91.93 0.002 0.001 0.533
Maximum Famp (μV) 1054.07 ± 451.62 798.97 ± 376.37 625.48 ± 172.46 <0.001 0.002 <0.001
Giant F-waves (%) 2.49 ± 4.38 2.05 ± 11.73 0.12 ± 0.14 <0.001 0.003 <0.001
Frequency of Patients with giant F-waves 20/32 12/37 2/30 <0.001 0.010 0.013
Peroneal nerve
Min F latency (ms) 44.25 ± 7.31 44.19 ± 6.00 43.03 ± 3.44 0.624 0.159 0.672
F persistence (%) 33.14 ± 23.92 52.37 ± 25.98 46.93 ± 27.16 0.007 0.188 <0.001
Mean Famp (μV) 398.88 ± 219.74 227.46 ± 283.16 154.31 ± 91.98 <0.001 0.083 <0.001
Maximum Famp (μV) 840.35 ± 494.14 470.15 ± 334.20 370.21 ± 202.03 <0.05 >0.05 <0.05
Giant F-waves (%) 20.46 ± 28.66 5.47 ± 20.24 1.22 ± 7.13 <0.001 0.084 <0.001
Frequency of Patients with giant F-waves 22/32 10/37 3/30 <0.001 0.080 0.001

ALS, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; CMAP, compound muscle action potential; Famp, F-wave amplitude; Min F latency, minimum F-wave latency; SBMA, spinobulbar muscular atrophy. Values are mean ± SD. Values with significant differences printed in bold characters. For comparisons of parameters between the SBMA patients, the ALS patients, and the normal controls, Bonferroni adjustment was used and α’ < 0.0167 was considered statistically significant.