Skip to main content
. 2016 Mar 7;23(3):236–242. doi: 10.1128/CVI.00613-15

TABLE 1.

Reproducibility of HAI titers is high within laboratories

Laboratory Intra-assay precisiona [no. of samples with results differing >2-fold from duplicate-sample results/total no. of sample pairs (%)]
Interassay reproducibilityb [no. of assays with results differing >2-fold from repeat assay results/total no. of sample assays (%)]
Median interassay % GCV [minimum–maximum]
H1N1 H3N2 All viruses H1N1 H3N2 All viruses
A NR NR NR 0/40 (0) 0/40 (0) 0/80 (0) 41.4 [0–49.2]
B 0/60 (0) 0/60 (0) 0/120 (0) 0/60 (0) 0/60 (0) 0/120 (0) 22.7 [0–43]
C 0/60 (0) ND 0/60 (0) 4/60 (6.7) ND 4/60 (6.7) 40.6 [0–68.5]
D 0/60 (0) 1/60 (1.7) 1/120 (0.8) 2/60 (3.3) 5/60 (8.3) 7/120 (5.8) 18.1 [0–91.2]
E 0/60 (0) 0/60 (0) 0/120 (0) 0/60 (0) 0/60 (0) 0/120 (0) 0 [0–46.2]
Overall 0/240 (0) 1/180 (0.6) 1/420 (0.2) 6/280 (2.1) 5/220 (2.3) 11/500 (2.2) 22.7 [0–91.2]
a

NR, single replicates tested; ND, no data (laboratory C analyzed only H1N1 samples and was excluded from the H3N2 analyses).

b

A total of 10 samples/virus were analyzed in 6 assays by laboratories B to E to give a total of 60 sample assays/virus; laboratory A returned data from just 4 assays.