Figure - PMC

Skip to main content

View full-text article in PMC

. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Mar 9.

Published in final edited form as: Magn Reson Med. 2008 Jun;59(6):1311–1319. doi: 10.1002/mrm.21600

Fig. 4 — T_1ρ values (ms) from treated and control animals with different B₁ values (a: 0.02 G, b: 0.8 G and c: 1.4 G), and T_2ρ values (ms) from treated and control animals calculated with different adiabatic full passage pulses during 8 days (d: HS1, e: HS4 and f: HS8) (● high, moderate and low treatment response groups; ○ control animals). All values are given as mean ± SEM. Statistically significant differences for treated animals from the control animals were analyzed using Student’s paired t-test (* p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01).

Inline graphic — T_1ρ values (ms) from treated and control animals with different B₁ values (a: 0.02 G, b: 0.8 G and c: 1.4 G), and T_2ρ values (ms) from treated and control animals calculated with different adiabatic full passage pulses during 8 days (d: HS1, e: HS4 and f: HS8) (● high, moderate and low treatment response groups; ○ control animals). All values are given as mean ± SEM. Statistically significant differences for treated animals from the control animals were analyzed using Student’s paired t-test (* p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01).