Skip to main content
. 2016 Mar 8;8:28. doi: 10.1186/s13148-016-0198-1

Table 1.

Patient and treatment characteristics

Patient and treatment characteristics
Parameters Pilot phase n = 32 Validation phase n = 115
Relapse n = 16 Control n = 16 p value Relapse n = 30 Control n = 85 p value
Age at diagnosis (years) Median 53.5 52 0.88 52 54 0.59
Range 36–71 35–74 33–79 37–78
Menopause (n) No 4 (25 %) 4 (25 %) 1.0 11 (36.7 %) 32 (37.6 %) 0.37
Yes 8 (50 %) 8 (50 %) 17 (56.7 %) 40 (47.1 %)
Unclear 4 (25 %) 4 (25 %) 2 (6.7 %) 13 (15.3 %)
T (n) T1 10 (62.5 %) 10 (62.5 %) 1.0 26 (86.7 %) 75 (88.2 %) 0.82
T2 6 (37.5 %) 6 (37.5 %) 4 (13.3 %) 10 (11.8 %)
N (n) N0 13 (81.3 %) 13 (81.3 %) 1.0 24 (80 %) 67 (78.8 %) 0.88
N1 2 (12.5 %) 2 (12.5 %) 6 (20 %) 18 (21.1 %)
N2 1 (6.3 %) 1 (6.3 %) 0 0
M (n) M0 16 (100 %) 16 (100 %) 1.0 30 (100 %) 85 (100 %) 1.0
M1 0 0 0 0
Grading (n) G1 1 (6.3 %) 0 0.87 3 (10 %) 8 (9.4 %) 0.75
G2 8 (50 %) 9 (56.3 %) 18 (60 %) 55 (64.7 %)
G3 7 (43.8 %) 7 (43.8 %) 9 (30 %) 22 (25.9 %)
Histology (n) IDC 13 (81.3 %) 15 (93.8 %) 0.56 22 (73.3 %) 63 (74.1 %) 0.98
ILC 3 (18.8 %) 1 (6.3 %) 5 (16.7 %) 12 (14.1 %)
Tubular 0 0 2 (6.7 %) 6 (7.1 %)
Other 0 0 1 (3.3 %) 4 (4.7 %)
In situ component (n) Yes 14 (87.5 %) 10 (62.5 %) 0.24 17 (56.7 %) 47 (55.3 %) 0.97
No 2 (12.5 %) 6 (6.25 %) 13 (43.3 %) 35 (41.2 %)
Lymphangiosis 0 0 0 1 (1.2 %)
Not stated 0 0 0 2 (2.4 %)
Receptors (n) ER positive 8 (50 %) 10 (62.5 %) 0.56 23 (76 %) 67 (78.8 %) 0.81
ER negative 8 (50 %) 6 (37.5 %) 7 (23.3 %) 18 (21.2 %)
PR positive 8 (50 %) 8 (50 %) 0.56 19 (63.3 %) 62 (72.9 %) 0.32
PR negative 8 (50 %) 8 (50 %) 11 (36.7 %) 23 (27.1 %)
her2neu Positive 8 (50 %) 4 (25 %) 0.24 11 (37 %) 24 (28 %) 0.81
Negative 5 (31 %) 9 (56 %) 18 (60 %) 44 (52 %)
Not assessable 3 (19 %) 3 (19 %) 1 (3 %) 17 (20 %)
Proliferation index ki67 < 20 % 10 (63 %) 6 (38 %) 0.24 15 (50 %) 49 (58 %) 0.78
ki67 > 20 % 5 (31 %) 9 (56 %) 10 (33 %) 26 (31 %)
Not assessable 1 (6 %) 1 (6 %) 5 (17 %) 10 (11 %)
Boost (n) Intraoperative 8 (50 %) 8 (50 %) 1.0 11 (36.7 %) 34 (40 %) 0.91
Percutaneous 8 (50 %) 8 (50 %) 16 (53.3 %) 51 (60 %)
None 0 0 3 (10 %) 0
Boost dose (Gy) Dose intraoperative 10 Gy 10 Gy 0.84 10 Gy 10 Gy 0.58
Dose percutaneous 12 Gy 12 Gy 12 (15–19) Gy 12 (9–19) Gy
WBRT dose (Gy) Median 54 Gy 54 Gy 0.78 54 Gy 54 Gy 0.68
Range 51.2–61.2 Gy 51.2–57.8 Gy 51–63 Gy 51–57.6 Gy
Surgery (n) BCT 16 (100 %) 15 (93.8 %) 0.78 30 (100 %) 85 (100 %) 1.0
Mastectomy 0 1 (6.3 %) 0 0
Re-Excisition (n) Yes 8 (50 %) 4 (25 %) 0.24 12 (40 %) 33 (38.8 %) 0.91
No 8 (50 %) 12 (75 %) 18 (60 %) 52 (61.2 %)
Year of surgery (n) Before 1998 5 (31.3 %) 5 (31.3 %) 1.0 14 (46.7 %) 38 (44.7 %) 0.85
Since 1998 11 (68.8 %) 11 (68.8 %) 16 (53.3 %) 47 (55.3 %)
Chemotherapy (n) Yes 8 (50 %) 6 (37.5 %) 0.56 11 (36.7 %) 20 (23.5 %) 0.18
No 8 (50 %) 10 (62.5 %) 19 (63.3 %) 65 (76.5 %)
Hormonal treatment (n) Yes 8 (50 %) 7 (43.8 %) 0.78 16 (53.3 %) 56 (65.9 %) 0.27
No 8 (50 %) 9 (56.3 %) 13 (43.3 %) 26 (30.6 %)
Unclear 0 0 1 (3.3 %) 3 (3.5 %)
Tumor burden in biopsy (%) Median 70 50 0.34 70 50 0.52
Range 10–90 10–90 10–90 10–90

Patient and treatment characteristics as well as the relative tumor burden in the samples are shown. The relapse group and control were compared with the Mann-Whitney U test. Neither in the pilot nor in the validation phase statistically significant differences of potentially prognostic parameters were detected between the relapse and the control group. The stainings for her2 and ki-67 were performed according to the standard procedures implemented at the Department of Pathology. Because some of the specimens were quite old (minimum 5 years) in some cases, the stainings—even on repetition—did not yield valid result due to technical problems with the non-adhesive FFPE sections