Skip to main content
. 2015 Mar 25;20(5):529–542. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2015.1023766

Table 3.

Characteristics of studies included, outcome measure: quality of life.

Author(s), year Survey year (waves) Location Sample – total Sample – review Age – total Age – review SEP measure1 Outcome measure COV2 Stratified analysis3
Bowling and Stenner (2011) 2007–2008(1) Great Britain 1276 1276 65+ 65+ housing tenure WHOQOL-OLD, CASP -19, OPQOL score ABCEF
Bowling, Banister, Sutton, Evans, and Windsor (2002) 2000–2001(1) Great Britain 999 999 65+ 65+ Education, social class, income, housing tenure Single item ABCEF
Breeze et al. (2005) 1991--1999(1) Great Britain 5581 5581 75+ 75+ Area deprivation, social class PGCMS+SIP score ABCDE
Breeze et al. (2004) N/A(1) Great Britain 6298 6298 75+ 75+ Tenure status, social class PGCMS+SIP score ABCDEF
Chandola et al. (2007) 1991–2004(5) London, England 10308 N/A 50–74 60–74 Occupational status SF-36: two comp. ABC Age
Cramm et al. (2013) N/A(1) Rotterdam, Netherlands 945 945 70+ 70+ Education, income, home ownership SPF-IL score ABCF
de Belvis, Avolio, Sicuro et al. (2008) 1999–2000(1) Italy 33744 33744 60+ 60+ Education, adequacy of income SF-12: two comp. ABCDEF
de Belvis, Avolio, Spagnolo et al. (2008) 1999–2000(1) Lazio region, Italy 1601 1601 60+ 60+ Education, adequacy of income SF-12: two comp. ABCDEF --
Eviö, Pekkarinen, Sintonen, Tiitinen, and Valimaki (2007) 2002(1) Southern Finland 1663 1663 60–70 60–70 Education 15D score ACE
Gilhooly et al. (2007) N/A(1) Scotland 145 145 70–91 70–91 Area deprivation LEIPAD, QoL ABDEF
Halleröd (2009) 2002–2003(1) Sweden 3053 3053 66–99 66–99 Social class, income Two latent comp. ABC
Knurowski et al. (2004) 1999–2001(1) Krakow and Zagreb 814 814 65–85 65–85 Education Cantril's ladder ABE Sex, age
Knurowski et al. (2005) 1999–2001(1) Krakow, Poland 528 528 65–85 65–85 Education, occupation, income, home ownership Cantril's ladder AB
S
ex, age
König et al. (2010) 2001–2003(1) Six European countries 1659 1659 75+ 75+ Education, income SF-12: 2 comp. ABC --
Laudisio et al. (2013) 2004(1) Tuscania, Italy 356 356 75+ 75+ Education, economic resources HUI3 score ABDE Sex, age
Orfila et al. (2006) 1993--1994(1) Barcelona, Spain 544 544 72+ 72+ Education, social class NHP: emotional reaction subscale ABCDE Sex
Pavlovic et al. (2010) 2006–2007(1) Croatia 396 396 70–79 70–79 Education, pension SF-36: 2 and 8 comp. ABC --
Regidor et al. (1999) 1996(1) Spain 7823 1890 25+ 65+ Education SF-36: 8 comp. B Sex
Rodriguez-Blazquez et al. (2011) 2011(1) Spain 1106 1106 60+ 60+ education PWI score
Sherman, Forsberg, Karp, and Tornkvist (2012) 2006(1) Stockholm, Sweden 583 583 75 75 Education HI score BCE
Schmidt et al. (2012) 2008(1) Germany 2222 614 25+ 65+ Index of SEP SF-12: two comp. A Age
Stenzelius et al. (2005) N/A(1) Southern Sweden 4277 4277 75+ 75+ Occupational status SF-12: two comp. ABCE
von Heideken Wågert et al. (2005) 2000(1) Umeå, Sweden 199 199 85+ 85+ Education PGCMS score ABCEF
von dem Knesebeck, Wahrendorf, Hyde, and Siegrist (2007) 2004(1) 10 European countries 15080 N/A 50+ 65+ Education, income, home owner, car owner, net worth CASP-12 score BC Age

1Socioeconomic position (SEP) measures in bold are the ones found to be significantly associated with quality of life in final fully adjusted models.

2Covariates (COV) included in the analysis: A = age; B = gender; C = socio-demographic; D = health behaviour; E = other health status/disability; F = social support/contact.

3Stratified results shown for sex or age, text in bold indicates interaction sex*SEP or age*SEP on quality of life.