Skip to main content
. 2015 Mar 25;20(5):529–542. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2015.1023766

Table 4.

Characteristics of studies included, outcome measure: life satisfaction.

Author(s), year Survey year (waves) Location Sample – total Sample – review Age – total Age – review Inequality measure1 Outcome measure COV2 Stratified analysis3
Bockerman, Johansson, and Saarni (2012) 2000–2001(1) Finland 1928 1928 60+ 60+ Education, income Single item ABCE
Dykstra and Wagner (2007) 1990-1993(1) Amsterdam and Berlin 1177 1177 70+ 70+ Change in social class over the work career Single item ABC Sex
Enkvist, Ekstrom, and Elmstahl (2012) 2001–2004(2) Five Swedish municipalities 681 681 78–93 78–93 Education, economical sufficiency LSI-A score ABCEF
Gaymu and Springer (2012) 2004(1) 10 European countries 13,550 13,550 60+ 60+ Education, income, home ownership Single item ABCEF Sex
Lucchetti et al. (2008) 2003–2004(1) Southern Italy 304 304 75+ 75+ Education, occupation, economic resources LSI-A score ABCEF --
Melendez et al. (2009) N/A Valencia, Spain 181 181 65–92 65–92 Education, income LSI-A score ABCE
Schmidt et al. (2012) 2008(1) Germany 2222 614 25+ 65+ Index of SEP SWLS score A Age

1Socioeconomic position (SEP) measures in bold are the ones found to be significantly associated with life satisfaction in final fully adjusted models.

2Covariates (COV) included in the analysis: A = age; B = gender; C = socio-demographic; D = health behaviour; E = other health status/disability; F = social support/contact.

3Stratified results shown for sex or age, text in bold indicates interaction sex*SEP or age*SEP on life satisfaction.