Skip to main content
. 2015 Sep 2;23(2):324–332. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocv104

Table 3:

Potential clinical and research advantages of an open diabetes platform.

Current State Open Platform
Near one-to-one relationship between device and application Any application can use data from any device
Mobile apps require manual data entry by the user, leading to user burden and transcription errors Mobile apps automatically access and collect device data
A provider must learn to interpret data presented in each unique software application and visualization format from each device vendor (or choose only one device to prescribe to their patients) A provider selects and gains expertise using one software application of choice while still allowing patients the freedom to choose to use whichever devices they prefer
Patients may use devices (e.g., one pump and one continuous glucose monitoring device) from different vendors but are forced to sacrifice data interoperability Patients who choose any permutation of devices are able to use device data in an integrated fashion
Mobile app developers must each develop a unique vertical product stack including back-end features (e.g., secure and private data storage) App developers can focus on developing front-end, user-facing apps that integrate with the back-end of the Tidepool Platform
Diabetes software only uses and shows data from diabetes specific hardware Diabetes software can incorporate data from any source, including trackers for fitness/activity, heart rate, and food
Device companies must devote resources to software development Device companies can focus efforts and resources on hardware, their area of expertise
Clinical research studies utilizing devices are restricted in the permutations of devices they can use Clinical research studies can use any combination of devices
Developing new clinical decision algorithms in research studies requires many slow iterations of testing, refinement, and then pushing out the updated algorithm for testing again Researchers can more efficiently study clinical algorithms, pushing the algorithms out to users through the cloud and rapidly getting feedback about efficacy
Researchers must manually collect data for each new retrospective study they conduct Researchers can access and query a comprehensive clinical dataset that is already collected