Skip to main content
. 2015 Sep 29;351:h4580. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h4580

Table 3.

Association between dietary calcium intake and risk of total fracture in cohort studies

Study Fracture*/participants Association Groups Risk or daily calcium intake† Group 3 risk Group 4 risk Group 5 risk Cut points between each group (mg/d)‡ or unit for pooled risk
Group 1 Group 2
Cauley 200747 23 270/159 579 Nil NR§ NR§ NR§
Lewis 200751 275/5876 Nil NR§ NR§ NR§
Albrand 200339 75/672 Nil 2 824 (313) 804 (270) No fracture; fracture
Nguyen 200752 221/924 Nil 2 583 (284) 555 (300) No fracture; fracture
Samieri 201368 155/1482 Inverse 2 871 (439) 796 (398) No fracture; fracture
Huopio 200035 257/3068 Nil 1.10 (0.99 to 1.23) Per quartile decrease
Melton 200342 126/225 Inverse 1.29 (1.06 to 1.56) Per SD decrease
Papaioannou 200546 280/5143 Nil 1.005 (0.925 to 1.093) Per 500 mg/d increase
Meier 200855 113/609 Nil 1.43 (1.17 to 1.78) Per SD (322 mg/d) decrease
Diez-Perez 200748 311/5146 Inverse 2 1.92 (1.30 to 2.86) 1 250
Kung 200750 80/1435 Inverse 2 3.1 (1.9 to 5.2) 1 400
Van Geel 200753 380/2367 Nil 2 1.0 (0.8 to 1.2) 1 900
Khan 201264 824/12 528 Inverse 2 1 0.75 (0.60 to 0.94) Lowest quintile; highest quintile
Rouzi 201265 138/707 Inverse 2 1.66 (1.08 to 2.53) 1 391
Cumming 199728 1950/9704 Nil 4 1 1.0 (0.9 to 1.1) 0.9 (0.7 to 1.1) 0.9 (0.7 to 1.1) 400; 800; 1200
Kato 200036 1025/6250 Nil 5 1 1.06 (0.9 to 1.3) 0.93 (0.8 to 1.1) 1.10 (0.9 to 1.3) 0.92 (0.8 to 1.1) 569; 689; 799; 949
Key (F>50 y) 200749 888/NS Inverse 5 1.53 (1.05 to 2.23) 1.31 (0.98 to 1.77) 1.10 (0.87 to 1.39) 1.05 (0.87 to 1.27) 1 525; 700; 900; 1200
Key (M) 200749 343/7947 Nil 5 1.15 (0.63 to 2.09) 0.94 (0.59 to 1.49) 0.91 (0.62 to 1.32) 1.02 (0.76 to 1.37) 1 525; 700; 900; 1200
Dargent-Molina 200854 2408/36 217 Nil 4 1 1.05 (0.94 to 1.19) 1.00 (0.89 to 1.13) 0.91 (0.80 to 1.03) 829; 995; 1201
Nieves 200856 2205/52 144 Nil 3 1 0.94 (0.80 to 1.10) 0.92 (0.81 to 1.06) 500; 800
Nakamura 201162 51/773 Nil 4 0.64 (0.29 to 1.41) 0.81 (0.39 to 1.69) 0.73 (0.32 to 1.64) 1 410; 544; 722;
Warensjo 201163 14 738/61 433 Inverse 5 1.18 (1.12 to 1.25) 1.04 (0.98 to 1.10) 1 1.02 (0.96 to 1.07) 1.00 (0.95 to 1.06) 751; 882; 996; 1137

Nil=no association between calcium intake and risk of fracture; inverse=higher calcium intake associated with decreased risk of fracture or lower calcium intake associated with higher risk of fracture; SD=standard deviation; M=male; F=female; Q=quartile (values not reported in paper); NS=not stated.

*Number of participants with fracture.

†Hazard ratio or relative risk (95% CI) or mean (SD) mg/d.

‡For example, cut point of 250 indicates 2 groups of <250 and ≥250 mg/d; cut points of 400; 800; and 1200 indicate 4 groups <400; 400-799; 800-1199; ≥1200 mg/d.

§No numerical data were reported, but it was stated that there was no association between calcium intake and risk of fracture.