Skip to main content
. 2015 Sep 29;351:h4580. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h4580

Table 4.

Association between dietary calcium intake and risk of hip fracture in cohort studies

Study Fracture*/participans Association Groups Risk or daily calcium intake† Group 3 risk Group 4 risk Group 5 risk Cut points between each group (mg/d)‡ or unit for pooled risk
Group 1 Group 2
Dargent-Molina 200238 NS/1588 Nil NR§ NR§ NR§ NR§ NR§
Munger 199933 44/32 050 Nil 2 842 (322) 778 (267) No fracture; fracture
Nguyen 200752 24/924 Nil 2 583 (284) 489 (367) No fracture; fracture
Holbrook 198823 33/957 Inverse 0.6 Per 198 mg/1000 kcal/d increase
Meier 200855 27/609 Nil 1.32 (0.81 to 2.16) Per SD (322mg/d) decrease
Benetou 201161 275/29 122 Nil 1.02 (0.91 to 1.13) Per quintile increase
Diez-Perez 200748 49/5146 Inverse 2 2.52 (1.07 to 5.92) 1 250
Wickham 198924 44/1419 Nil 3 0.7 (0.1 to 3.9) 0.9 (0.2 to 4.3) 1 641; 901
Paganini-Hill (F) 199125 332/8600 Nil 3 1 1.02 (0.77 to 1.33) 1.11 (0.85 to 1.44) 280; 500;
Paganini-Hill (M) 199125 86/5049 Nil 3 1 0.87 (0.50 to 1.51) 1.25 (0.75 to 2.08) 280; 500;
Looker 199326 122/2226 Nil 4 1 0.86 (0.5 to 1.5) 1.03 (0.6 to 1.7) 0.72 (0.4 to 1.3) 300; 501; 776
Cumming 199728 332/9704 Nil 4 1 1.0 (0.7 to 1.3) 0.8 (0.5 to 1.2) 0.9 (0.5 to 1.6) 400; 800; 1200
Meyer (F) 199730 150/19 752 Nil 4 1 0.86 (0.55 to 1.35) 0.87 (0.56 to 1.35) 0.67 (0.42 to 1.08) 435; 569; 718
Meyer (M) 199730 55/20 035 Nil 4 1 0.96 (0.46 to 2.00) 1.08 (0.53 to 2.21) 0.64 (0.28 to 1.45) 623; 823; 1030
Owusu 199731 56/43 063 Nil 5 1 1.47 (0.65 to 3.28) 1.14 (0.50 to 2.64) 0.86 (0.35 to 2.13) 0.64 (0.24 to 1.69) 134; 248; 364; 591
Mussolino 199832 71/2879 Nil 4 1 0.83 (0.42 to 1.63) 0.76 (0.34 to 1.66) 0.76 (0.32 to 1.79) 417; 680; 1033
Feskanich 200340 603/72 337 Nil 5 1 1.13 (0.87 to 1.49) 1.29 (0.98 to 1.71) 1.04 (0.76 to 1.42) 1.08 (0.78 to 1.49) 500; 625; 750; 900
Nieves 200856 337/52 144 Nil 3 1 0.89 (0.61 to 1.31) 0.87 (0.63 to 1.21) 500; 800
Koh (F) 200957 692/35 241 Positive 4 1 1.16 (0.92 to 1.47) 1.36 (1.07 to 1.73) 1.45 (1.16 to 1.82) 259; 327; 425
Koh (M) 200957 276/27 913 Nil 4 1 1.23 (0.90 to 1.69) 0.87 (0.60 to 1.27) 1.24 (0.86 to 1.79) 259; 327; 425
Warensjo 201163 3871/61 433 U shaped 5 1.29 (1.17 to 1.43) 1.09 (0.98 to 1.21) 1 1.13 (1.01 to 1.26) 1.19 (1.06 to 1.32) 751; 882; 996; 1137

Nil=no association between calcium intake and risk of fracture; inverse=higher calcium intake associated with decreased risk of fracture or lower calcium intake associated with higher risk of fracture; SD=standard deviation; M=male; F=female; Q=quartile (values not reported in paper); NS=not stated.

*Number of participants with hip fracture.

†Hazard ratio or relative risk (95% confidence interval) or mean (SD) mg/d.

‡For example, cut point of 250 indicates 2 groups of <250 and ≥250 mg/d; cut points of 400; 800; and 1200 indicate 4 groups <400; 400-799; 800-1199; ≥1200 mg/d.

§ No numerical data were reported, but it was stated that there was no association between calcium intake and risk of fracture.