. 2016 Mar 9;11(3):e0150829. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0150829

Table 2. Standardized Factor Loadings, Factor Correlations, and Fit Indices of the CFA and ESEM Approaches for the Total TALIS 2013 Sample.

	CFA			ESEM
Item	Factor 1	Factor 2	Factor 3	Factor 1	Factor 2	Factor 3
Factor 1: Classroom Management
TT2G34D	.75 (.01)^*	–	–	.77 (.01)^*	–.06 (.01)^*	.03 (.01)^*
TT2G34F	.65 (.01)^*	–	–	.50 (.01)^*	.16 (.01)^*	.04 (.01)^*
TT2G34H	.80 (.01)^*	–	–	.83 (.01)^*	–.04 (.01)^*	.01 (.01)
TT2G34I	.76 (.01)^*	–	–	.81 (.01)^*	–.01 (.01)	–.05 (.01)^*
Factor 2: Instruction
TT2G34C	–	.65 (.01)^*	–	.06 (.01)^*	.34 (.01)^*	.31 (.02)^*
TT2G34J	–	.71 (.01)^*	–	.07 (.01)^*	.65 (.01)^*	.00 (.01)
TT2G34K	–	.73 (.01)^*	–	.04 (.01)^*	.77 (.01)^*	–.06 (.01)^*
TT2G34L	–	.76 (.01)^*	–	–.06 (.01)^*	.77 (.01)^*	.04 (.01)^*
Factor 3: Student Engagement
TT2G34A	–	–	.76 (.01)^*	.01 (.01)	–.02 (.01)	.77 (.01)^*
TT2G34B	–	–	.80 (.01)^*	–.07 (.01)^*	–.08 (.01)^*	.97 (.01)^*
TT2G34E	–	–	.69 (.01)^*	.16 (.01)^*	.07 (.01)^*	.51 (.01)^*
TT2G34G	–	–	.70 (.01)^*	.07 (.01)^*	.31 (.01)^*	.39 (.01)^*
Factor Correlations
Factor 2	.68 (.01)^*	–	–	.64 (.01)^*	–	–
Factor 3	.66 (.01)^*	.78 (.01)^*	–	.62 (.01)^*	.68 (.01)^*	–
Model Fit Indices
SB- χ² [df]	4,313.7 [51]^*			1,228.0 [33]^*
CFI	.950			.986
TLI	.936			.972
RMSEA	.023			.015
CI_90-RMSEA	[.022, .023]			[.014, .016]
SRMR	.041			.014

Note. Standard errors are shown in parentheses. SB- χ² = Satorra-Bentler corrected χ² value. CI_90-RMSEA = 90% confidence interval of the RMSEA, N = 164,687. In these analyses, the TALIS 2013 sample was considered a single-group sample.

* p < .01.