Skip to main content
. 2016 Feb 25;2016:9249040. doi: 10.1155/2016/9249040

Table 2.

Effect of EECN on % wound contraction and epithelialization period of wound in excision wound model.

Group % wound contraction Epithelialization period (days)
4th day 8th day 12th day 16th day
Group I (untreated) 4.39 ± 0.82 18.62 ± 0.69 42.62 ± 2.56 68.87 ± 0.91 19.16 ± 0.7
Group II (ointment base treated) 4.21 ± 0.19 19.48 ± 0.93 42.76 ± 1.36 71.2 ± 0.93 19.66 ± 0.66
Group III (standard) 14.55 ± 0.87
a∗∗∗, b∗∗∗
38.39 ± 0.46
a∗∗∗, b∗∗∗, c∗∗∗
67.38 ± 2.01
a∗∗∗, b∗∗∗
94.3 ± 0.43
a∗∗∗, b∗∗∗
17.33 ± 0.4
a∗∗, b∗∗
Group IV (2% w/w, ointment) 13.83 ± 1.0
a∗∗∗, b∗∗∗
31.11 ± 0.83
a∗∗∗, b∗∗∗, c∗∗
56.46 ± 0.79
a∗∗∗, b∗∗∗, c∗∗
80.21 ± 0.27
a∗∗∗, b∗∗∗, c∗∗
18.33 ± 0.22
Group V (5% w/w, ointment) 14.33 ± 0.94
a∗∗∗, b∗∗∗
34.82 ± 0.67
a∗∗∗, b∗∗∗
59.64 ± 1.18
a∗∗∗, b∗∗∗, c∗∗
93.58 ± 0.76
a∗∗∗, b∗∗∗
17.66 ± 0.7
a∗∗, b∗∗

All values are represented as mean ± SEM, n = 6 animals in each group. Data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA, followed by Tukey-Kramer Multiple Comparisons Test. a: significant difference as compared to untreated group (group I); b: significant difference as compared to ointment base treated group (group II); c: significant difference as compared to standard group (group III), and ∗∗ P < 0.01, ∗∗∗ P < 0.001.