Skip to main content
. 2016 Mar 10;6:23019. doi: 10.1038/srep23019

Table 2. Comparison of patient characteristics between good and poor surgical outcome groups.

Variable Good (n = 56) Poor (n = 40) P-value
Age at operation (yr)
 <60 16 7 0.022
 60–70 26 12  
 >70 14 21  
Male sex (n, %) 39 (69.6%) 27 (67.5%) 0.823
Diabetes mellitus (n, %) 15 (26.8%) 8 (20.0%) 0.443
Duration of symptoms (mo)
 <6 28 9 0.006
 6–12 13 8  
 >12 15 23  
Preoperative JOA score 5.7 ± 1.7 5.4 ± 1.4 0.436
Postoperative JOA score 9.2 ± 0.8 7.2 ± 0.9 0.000
Preoperative SCR
 <1.54 39 16 0.004
 ≥1.54 17 24  
OLF level
 T1-T5 4 3 0.452
 T5-T9 3 5  
 T9-T12 49 32  
Number of OLF Levels
 1 33 20 0.613
 2 17 16  
 >2 6 4  
Ossification of dura mater (n, %) 27(48.2%) 21(52.5%) 0.679
CT axial classification
 Lateral 10 4 0.716
 Extended and enlarged 12 10  
 Fused 30 22  
 Tuberous 4 4  
Surgical technique
 Laminectomy 50 36 1.000
 Posterior decompression and fusion 6 4  
Complications
 Hematoma 2/56(3.6%) 2/40(5.0%) 1.000
 CSF leakage 3/56(5.4%) 4/40(10.0%) 0.446
 Wound infection 0/56(0%) 1/40(2.5%) 0.417

JOA: Japanese Orthopaedic Association; SCR: signal change ratio; OLF: ossification of the ligamentum flavum; CT: computed tomography; CSF: cerebrospinal fluid; mo: month; yr: year