Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Mar 9.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Chem Soc. 2016 Feb 26;138(9):3136–3144. doi: 10.1021/jacs.5b13008

Table 3.

Evaluation of azide 2, anti-triazoles 1 (SOL) and 19–32 using minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) assays (μg/mL) against E. coli and S. pneumoniae strains. Compounds are rank-ordered by potency in MIC assays against E. coli then S. pneumoniae strains. MIC values determined in three independent experiments; translation values in two independent experiments. Analysis of the data in Table 3 reveals that the poorest-performing compounds (32, 20, and 29, shown in red) against both strains correlate with the binding data; in fact, 20 and 29 had the highest Kd values. The polarity of 29 and 32 may be contributing to poor uptake and/or permeability. Predictive indices (PIs) are calculated for the MICs against each strain with respect to Kd values.

Cmpd Kd (nM) ΔG (kcal/mol) MIC E. coli DK pKK 3535 MIC E. coli DK A2058G MIC S. pneumo ATCC 49619 MIC S. pneumo 655 mefA
27 1.8 −11.9 1 1 0.004 0.5
19 1.1 −12.2 2 1 0.002 0.5
28 1.5 −12.0 2 2 0.032 4
SOL (1) 0.6 −12.6 2 2 0.006 0.375
Azide 2 2.1 −11.8 2 2 0.002 0.25
24 1.4 −12.1 2 2 0.005 1
26 2.5 −11.7 2 2 0.002 0.5
25 1.1 −12.2 2 2 0.016 0.5
22 1.7 −12.0 2 4 0.004 1
23 1.3 −12.1 4 4 0.008 1
21 1.6 −12.0 4 4 0.016 1
31 2.4 −11.7 4 4 0.016 2
30 2.5 −11.7 4 4 0.032 2
20 3.5 −11.5 4 4 0.016 2
32 0.8 −12.4 8 8 0.063 4
29 5 −11.3 32 32 4 4
PI N/A N/A 0.46 0.48 0.34 0.44