Skip to main content
. 2015 Dec 28;11(3):423–430. doi: 10.2215/CJN.01050115

Table 4.

Effect estimates from multivariate analysis using generalized linear models

QoL Measures and Predictors Effect Estimate 95% Confidence Interval Adjusted P Value
SF-12 MCS
 Age 1.00 1.00 to 1.01 0.91
 Sex 1.03 0.96 to 1.11 0.63
 Time on dialysis 1.00 1.00 to 1.00 0.83
 Stoke–Davies comorbidity score 0.98 0.95 to 1.02 0.63
 Frailty scorea 0.94 0.91 to 0.97 <0.01
 HD versus PD 0.98 0.92 to 1.06 0.87
SF-12 PCS
 Age 1.00 0.99 to 1.00 0.85
 Sex 1.10 1.00 to 1.22 0.23
 Time on dialysis 1.00 1.00 to 1.00 0.70
 Stoke–Davies comorbidity score 0.99 0.95 to 1.04 0.91
 Frailty scorea 0.88 0.84 to 0.91 <0.01
 HD versus PD 1.03 0.93 to 1.13 0.85
Illness Intrusiveness Rating Scale
 Agea 0.98 0.98 to 0.99 <0.01
 Sex 1.08 0.98 to 1.21 0.40
 Time on dialysis 1.00 1.00 to 1.00 0.85
 Stoke–Davies comorbidity score 0.99 0.94 to 1.03 0.85
 Frailty scorea 1.14 1.09 to 1. 20 <0.01
 HD versus PD 1.07 0.96 to 1.19 0.51
Barthel Index
 Age 1.00 0.99 to 1.01 0.91
 Sex 1.02 0.93 to 1.12 0.89
 Time on dialysis 1.00 1.00 to 1.00 0.96
 Stoke–Davies comorbidity score 0.98 0.94 to 1.02 0.57
 Frailty scorea 0.89 0.86 to 0.93 <0.01
 HD versus PD 0.98 0.89 to 1.08 0.87
Symptom score
 Age 0.99 0.98 to 1.00 0.43
 Sex 1.07 0.89 to 1.30 0.74
 Time on dialysis 1.00 1.00 to 1.00 0.98
 Stoke–Davies comorbidity score 0.99 0.91 to 1.07 0.91
 Frailty scorea 1.23 1.13 to 1.34 <0.01
 HD versus PD 1.00 0.83 to 1.20 0.98
Renal Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire
 Age 1.00 1.00 to 1.00 0.93
 Sex 1.00 0.95 to 1.05 0.96
 Time on dialysis 1.00 1.00 to 1.00 0.29
 Stoke–Davies comorbidity score 1.00 0.98 to 1.02 0.93
 Frailty score 0.98 0.96 to 1.00 0.14
 HD versus PDa 0.94 0.89 to 0.98 0.04
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale
 Age 0.99 0.97 to 1.00 0.19
 Sex 0.97 0.80 to 1.17 0.89
 Time on dialysis 1.00 1.00 to 1.00 0.86
 Stoke–Davies comorbidity score 1.02 0.94 to 1.10 0.87
 Frailty scorea 1.21 1.11 to 1.31 <0.01
 HD versus PD 0.97 0.81 to 1.17 0.91

Effects are multiplicative for the γ-regression model (e.g., an increase of 1 U frailty score reduces the SF-12 PCS score by a factor of 0.88 [95% confidence interval, 0.84 to 0.91]; an increase of 1 U frailty score increases the symptom burden by a factor of 1.23 [95% confidence interval, 1.13 to 1.34]). QoL, quality of life; SF-12, Short Form-12; MCS, Mental Component Summary; HD, hemodialysis; PD, peritoneal dialysis; PCS, Physical Component Summary.

a

Significant predictors (P<0.05).