Skip to main content
. 2016 Feb 1;10(1):10–16. doi: 10.1049/iet-syb.2015.0034

Table 1.

Comparison of estimated parameters in the non‐linear state‐space model for the JAK‐STAT pathway using RBPF, EKF, ML approach and UKF

Study k 1 k 2 k 3 k 4 τ
RBPF (our study) 0.022916 2.343347 0.117178 0.102687 6.1
EKF 0.0211 2.2788 0.1064 0.1057 6 min
ML 0.0210 2.4600 0.1066 0.1066 6.4 min
UKF 0.0515 3.3900 0.3500