Skip to main content
. 2016 Mar 10;11(3):e0151477. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0151477

Fig 4. Genetic interactions between cycG and Hairless mutants during wing development.

Fig 4

(A) Wing of a wild type fly (Ore-1); longitudinal veins L2-L5 are labelled. (B) The wing of a heterozygous HP8/+ mutant female (Ore-1 background) shows the haplo-insufficient H phenotype characterized by a gap in the longitudinal L5 vein (encircled). (C) In the background of one mutant cycGHR7 copy, the H wing phenotype is similar to the Ore-1 background (see also E). (D) Wing of a female fly of the genotype HP8 cycGHR7 / + cycGHR7. Note complete L5 vein but gap in L4 (encircled). In general the venation phenotype HP8 of appears enhanced in the homozygous cycGHR7 background; the fraction of flies bearing a gap in L4 is strongly increased (see also E). (E) Graph showing the percentage of wings with vein gaps in HP8 female flies with different genetic backgrounds. Heterozygous HP8 females show normal venation in about 20% of the wings; in the others mostly L5 is affected (63–70%), L4 in addition much less frequently (7–15%). Rarely, L4 is solely affected (1 wing of 109 in HP8 /+). In the homozygous cycGHR7 background, the fraction of wings where both, L4 plus L5 are affected is increased (26–50%). Notably, the peculiar phenotype of gaps in L4 only is seen in up to 36% of the flies. Two different recombinant stocks (lines 1, 2) were analyzed, which showed a similar effect albeit with some variations. Female flies were analysed. Number of wings analyzed is given in each column.