Skip to main content
. 2016 Mar 10;11(3):e0150602. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0150602

Table 1. In silico and in vitro characterization of nuciferine.

SEA Predictions (in order of confidence) In Vitro Affinity (nM) Functional EC50 (nM) Function Type
Radioligand used
D1 (5.4e-32) 752 [3H]SCH23390
D2 (1.6e-25) 515 [3H]N-methyl Spiperone 65.07 Partial agonist
D3 (1.3e-12) 741 [3H]N-methyl Spiperone
D5 (5.0e-13) (neg) [3H]SCH23390 2600 Partial agonist, ~50%
VMAT2 (2.1e-13) NA
SK Channel (3.8e-11) NA
5-HT1A (1.2e-11) 77 [3H]WAY100635 3230 Agonist
5-HT5B (1.6e-7)
5-HT7 (4.1e-4) 49.8 [3H]LSD 150 Inverse agonist
5-HT2A (4.1e-6) 312 [3H]Ketanserin 478 Antagonist
Unpredicted Hits
5-HT2B 41 [3H]LSD 1000 Antagonist
5-HT2C 60.5 [3H]Mesulergine 131 Antagonist
5-HT6 268 [3H]LSD 700 Partial agonist, 17.3%
D4 1387 [3H]N-methyl Spiperone 2000 agonist

Receptor targets are listed with their respective SEA prediction value (if available), followed by their competition binding affinity value (if available), followed by their functional EC50 value (if available) and the corresponding function type.

Information about cell lines for all assays can be found at http://pdsp.med.unc.edu/pdspw/binding.php.