Table 1. Univariable regression analyses predicting wellbeing from symptoms, personal resources, and the interaction between symptoms and resources (n = 2411).
| 95% bootstrapped CI | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta | Lower | Upper | p | |
| Humor | ||||
| Symptoms | -0.661 | -0.706 | -0.617 | < .001 |
| Affiliative humor | 0.120 | 0.089 | 0.150 | < .001 |
| Symptoms*Affiliative | 0.012 | -0.027 | 0.052 | .545 |
| Symptoms | -0.623 | -0.671 | -0.583 | < .001 |
| Self-enhancing humor | 0.184 | 0.153 | 0.216 | < .001 |
| Symptoms*Self-enhancing | 0.005 | -0.029 | 0.041 | .743 |
| Symptoms | -0.687 | -0.730 | -0.645 | < .001 |
| Aggressive humor | 0.018 | -0.015 | 0.049 | .255 |
| Symptoms*Aggressive | 0.003 | -0.035 | 0.042 | .882 |
| Symptoms | -0.708 | -0.757 | -0.659 | < .001 |
| Self-defeating humor | -0.036 | -0.068 | -0.003 | .034 |
| Symptoms*Self-defeating | 0.074 | 0.046 | 0.099 | < .001 |
| Social company | ||||
| Symptoms | -0.733 | -0.792 | -0.671 | < .001 |
| Having a partner | 0.333 | 0.270 | 0.402 | < .001 |
| Symptoms*Partner | 0.084 | 0.010 | 0.160 | .030 |
| Symptoms | -0.727 | -0.788 | -0.667 | < .001 |
| Having a pet | 0.013 | -0.048 | 0.073 | .631 |
| Symptoms*Pet | 0.079 | 0.005 | 0.156 | .036 |
| Other resources | ||||
| Symptoms | -0.677 | -0.719 | -0.638 | < .001 |
| Empathy | 0.097 | 0.068 | 0.130 | < .001 |
| Symptoms*Empathy | 0.027 | -0.005 | 0.062 | .120 |
| Symptoms | -0.676 | -0.728 | -0.627 | < .001 |
| Religion | -0.023 | -0.086 | 0.037 | .463 |
| Symptoms*Religion | -0.047 | -0.129 | 0.039 | .271 |
| Symptoms | -0.587 | -0.701 | -0.498 | < .001 |
| Daytime activities | 0.350 | 0.214 | 0.493 | < .001 |
| Symptoms*Daytime activities | -0.099 | -0.201 | 0.017 | .081 |
Note. Dependent variable: Wellbeing. All continuous variables are z-transformed, thus estimated coefficients equal standardized B values (Beta). Categorical variables 0 = no, 1 = yes. Adjusted for sex, age, and education. In bold: significant effects. CI = Confidence Interval.