Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Curr Opin Organ Transplant. 2016 Apr;21(2):99–106. doi: 10.1097/MOT.0000000000000283

Table 3.

Incidence of recurrent or de novo allograft NAFLD and NASH

First Author (Reference#) Steatosis in NASH or Cryptogenic Recipients Steatosis in Non-NASH Recipients Progression to NASH in NASH or Cryptogenic Recipients Median Duration of follow up (months)
Contos et al (25) 100% 25% 10% 42 ± 32
Maor-Kendler et al (26)   18% 11.6%@ 12&
  38% 10.3%@   0% 45 ± 17
Tanaka et al (28)# 14% 64
Seo et al (29)   18%   9% 23
Lim et al (30) 40% 13% 44 ± 4
Dumortier et al (31)$ 31.1% 10% 40 (6–189)
@

average for cholestatic, alcoholic, and HCV recipients

#

7 NASH recipients that received living donor liver transplants

$

only included non-NASH recipients without recurrent disease

&

one year protocol biopsy