Table 1.
Risk | Evidence | Comments | |
---|---|---|---|
Personal factors | |||
Age | +++ | *** | High age is strongly related to hearing loss |
Male sex | ++ | *** | Men lose more hearing than women |
Hereditary conditions | ++ | *** | Explains a great part of the individual variation in hearing loss |
Socioeconomic factors | + | ** | Low social class, income and education related to reduced hearing |
Ethnicity | + | ** | White Caucasians lose more hearing than Afro-Americans |
Health factors | |||
Ear disease | ++ | *** | |
Cardiovascular disease | + | * | |
Hypertension | + | * | |
Diabetes | + | * | |
Smoking | + | * | |
Cholesterol | ? | * | |
Triglycerides | ? | * | |
Occupations | |||
Industrial workers | ++ | ** | Depending on noise exposure level and use of protection |
Shipyard workers | ++ | ** | |
Construction workers | ++ | ** | |
Offshore workers | + | * | |
Professional divers | + | ** | |
Fire fighters | + | ** | |
Military workers | ++ | ** | |
Civil aviation workers | + | ** | |
Railway workers | + | ** | |
Farmers | ++ | ** | |
Musicians | + | ** | |
Kindergarten employees | + | * | Probably too low noise exposure |
Noise exposure | |||
Continuous noise | +/+++ | *** | High risk with unprotected noise exposure L ex, 8h > 90 dB. Low risk <85 dB |
Impulse noise | +++ | *** | |
Gunfire | ++ | *** | |
Leisure-time noise | + | ** | Probably of minor importance at a group level |
Hearing protection | − | ** | |
Other exposures | |||
Vibration | + | * | Vibration may increase the NIHL |
Chemicals | + | * | Styrene, CS2, toluene, lead, mercury and CO |
Medication | +/+++ | *** | Cisplatin, aminoglycosides |
Risk assessment: +++, severe risk; ++, moderate risk; +, low risk; ?, uncertain risk; −, reduced risk
Level of evidence: ***, high; **, medium; *, low