Table 5.

Associations between organic food consumption and cryptorchidism.^a

Exposure to organic food	Total (n = 35,107)	Cryptorchidism n (%)	Crude OR (95% CI)	Adjustedb OR (95% CI)	Adjustedc OR (95% CI)
Any organic foodd
Never/seldom	17,996	79 (0.4)	1	1	NA
Sometimes, often, or mostly	17,111	72 (0.4)	0.96 (0.70, 1.32)	0.91 (0.66, 1.26)
Organic vegetables
Never/seldom	22,759	98 (0.4)	1	1	1
Sometimes, often, or mostly	12,348	53 (0.4)	0.99 (0.71, 1.39)	0.92 (0.66, 1.30)	1.03 (0.61, 1.74)
Organic fruit
Never/seldom	25,006	107 (0.4)	1	1	1
Sometimes, often, or mostly	10,101	44 (0.5)	1.02 (0.72, 1.45)	1.04 (0.73, 1.44)	1.17 (0.73, 1.90)
Organic cereals
Never/seldom	27,980	123 (0.4)	1	1	1
Sometimes, often, or mostly	7,127	28 (0.4)	0.89 (0.59, 1.35)	0.86 (0.57, 1.30)	0.88 (0.55, 1.42)
Organic milk/dairy products
Never/seldom	25,992	120 (0.5)	1	1	1
Sometimes, often, or mostly	9,115	31 (0.3)	0.74 (0.50, 1.09)	0.70 (0.47, 1.05)	0.65 (0.40, 1.04)
Organic eggs
Never/seldom	23,144	99 (0.4)	1	1	1
Sometimes, often, or mostly	11,963	52 (0.5)	1.02 (0.73, 1.42)	0.97 (0.69, 1.36)	1.09 (0.65, 1.82)
Organic meat
Never/seldom	30,814	136 (0.4)	1	1	1
Sometimes, often, or mostly	4,293	15 (0.4)	0.79 (0.46, 1.35)	0.78 (0.45, 1.33)	0.78 (0.44, 1.38)
NA, not applicable. aNumbers of observations (total and cases) do not account for observations with missing covariate data (123 missing including 1 case). bResults from logistic regression models adjusted for maternal education, household income, and paternal age. In addition, the model for each organic food group was adjusted for the total daily intake of food items (organic and nonorganic) in the respective group. cAdditional adjustment for any organic food. dReported use of at least one of the organic food groups. No data were missing on use of organic food.