Table 2.
Quality statistics of GEM-PRO models
| Model | PDB coveragea | Homology model coverageb | PDB quality scorec | Homology model quality (TM-score)d |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| T. maritima | 136/478 | 342 | 0.82 (0.86) | 0.79 |
| E. coli | 490/1366 | 1366 | 0.77 (0.95) | 0.82 |
aNumber of total genes with PDB structures (includes minimally modified) after QC/QA; bNumber of total genes with homology models. Note that there may be overlap between PDB and homology model coverage; cMean quality score of PDB structures in the GEM-PRO model for all available PDB structures. In parentheses are the subset of “best representative structures” for all metabolic gene (as ranked by the QC/QA pipeline), scaled (0, 1] where 0 is low quality and 1 is the highest quality; dMean quality score of the homology models taken from the I-TASSER TM-score metric, is the range [0,1] with a value >0.5 implying correct topology of the model [28]