Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Mar 11.
Published in final edited form as: J Reconstr Microsurg. 2015 Sep 15;32(3):178–182. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1563737

Table 1. Study sample demographics of handsewn vs. coupled venous anastomoses. Study Sample Demographics (N=857 flaps).

Variables HANDSEWN COUPLED p-value
(n=303) (n=554)
Type of Reconstruction
 MS-TRAM 160 (52.8%) 272 (49.1%) 0.30
 DIEP 92 (30.4%) 262 (47.3%) <0.001
 Free TRAM 41 (13.5%) 10 (0.02%) <0.001
 SIEA 4 (0.01%) 4 (0.01%) 0.38
 SGAP 6 (0.02%) 1 (0.001%) 0.005
 TUG 0 (0%) 5 (0.01%) 0.10
Recipient Vessel
 IMA/IMV 147 (48.5%) 512 (92.4%) <0.001
 TDA/TDV 155 (51.2%) 41 (7.4%) <0.001
 Other 1 (0.3%) 1 (0.2%) 0.66
Timing of Reconstruction
 Immediate 242 (80%) 353 (63.7%) <0.001
 Delayed 61 (20%) 201 (36.3%)
Laterality
 Unilateral 191 (63%) 240 (43.3%) <0.001
 Bilateral 112 (37%) 314 (56.7%)
Preoperative Radiation 81 (26.7%) 206 (37.2%) 0.002
Preoperative Chemotherapy 76 (25.1%) 192 (34.7%) 0.002

Venous thrombosis requiring revision 12 (0.04%) 8 (0.01%) 0.02