Table 3.
Results of the main studies to have used the CPP paradigm to evaluate the rewarding effects of psychostimulants in animals classified as high or low novelty seekers according to an inescapable NS paradigm.
Novelty-Seeking Animal Model | Animals | Age | Drug | Rewarding Effects of Psychostimulants in CPP | References |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Locomotor response to novelty | Male Long Evans rats | PND 46 Adolescent PND 70 Adult |
Amphetamine (0.5 or 1.0 mg/kg) i.p. |
HR less sensitive to amphetamine CPP (%time) |
Mathew et al., 2010 |
Male Sprague-Dawley rats | 290-330g Adult 200-225g Adult |
Cocaine (5,10,12,15,20 mg/kg) i.p Amphetamine (0.4mg/kg) s.c |
HR=LR acquired CPP | Gong et al., 1996 Kosten and Miserendino, 1998 Dietz et al., 2007 Capriles et al., 2012 Robinet et al., 1998 | |
C57BL/6J male mice | 7-8 weeks Adult | Cocaine (4, 8, 12 mg/kg) i.p. |
LR>HR in CPP at low doses | Brabant et al., 2005 Shimosato and Watanabe, 2003 |
|
Male Slc:ddY mice | 5 weeks Adolescent |
Cocaine (5, 10, 20mg/kg) i.p. |
|||
Male and female OF1 mice | PND 35 Adolescent PND 56 Young adult |
Cocaine (1mg/kg) i.p. |
10 min: young adult HNR>LNS 1h: HR young adult male=LR young adult female acquired CPP |
Arenas et al., 2014 |