Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Apr 8.
Published in final edited form as: Cognition. 2015 May 28;142:81–95. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2015.05.014

Table 2.

Overview of performance on valid-signal trials: Probability of responding on a valid-signal trial [p(respond|signal)], average valid change-signal delay (CSD), average reaction time for go responses on signal–respond trials (signal–respond RT), the difference between signal–respond RT and no-signal RT (both correct and incorrect responses were included when mean no-signal RT was calculated), and average reaction time for the change response (Change RT), as a function of Group (consistent-mapping vs. varied-mapping) and Experiment. Change RT corresponds to the time interval between the presentation of the valid signal and the left/right key press.

p(respond|signal)
CSD
Signal–respond RT
No-signal RT minus signal–respond RT
Change RT
M sd M sd M sd M sd M sd
Experiment 1
CM 0.480 0.069 352 172 601 151 −63 44 597 97
VM 0.472 0.081 348 145 682 117 −12 54 649 84
Experiment 2
CM 0.461 0.070 353 134 679 115 −48 72 696 85
VM 0.479 0.076 282 129 741 109 30 73 797 108
Experiment 3
CM 0.490 0.061 253 103 546 86 −22 61 682 101
VM 0.503 0.083 272 126 606 109 −4 68 667 84
Experiment 4
CM 0.490 0.058 279 122 557 97 −41 43 620 64
VM 0.490 0.073 275 124 635 117 12 46 659 137

Note: Change RT was higher in the varied-mapping condition than in the consistent-mapping condition in Experiments 1–2 (both p’s < .001), but the group differences were not statistically significant in Experiments 3 and 4, p = .63 and p = .20, respectively.