Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Apr 8.
Published in final edited form as: Cognition. 2015 May 28;142:81–95. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2015.05.014

Table 3.

Performance on signal–respond trials was analyzed by means of mixed ANOVAs with Group (consistent-mapping or varied-mapping) and Experiment as a between-subjects factors and Trial Type (no-signal vs. signal–respond) as within-subjects factor.

Df1 Df2 SS1 SS2 F p p < .05 η2gen
Experiment 3 184 1,022,371 4,900,577 12.796 0.000 * 0.164
Condition 1 184 197,333 4,900,577 7.409 0.007 * 0.036
Trial Type 1 184 32,495 318,397 18.779 0.000 * 0.006
Experiment by Condition 3 184 16,487 4,900,577 0.206 0.892 0.003
Experiment by Trial Type 3 184 12,169 318,397 2.344 0.074 0.002
Condition by Trial Type 1 184 59,959 318,397 34.650 0.000 * 0.011
Experiment:Condition:Trial Type 3 184 10,813 318,397 2.083 0.104 0.002