Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Apr 8.
Published in final edited form as: Cognition. 2015 May 28;142:81–95. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2015.05.014

Table 4.

Overview of the Analyses of Variance of no-signal and invalid-signal trials. Performance was analyzed by means of mixed ANOVAs with Group (consistent-mapping or varied-mapping) and Experiment as a between-subjects factor and Trial Type (no-signal vs. invalid-signal) as within-subjects factor.

Df1 Df2 SS1 SS2 F p p < .05 η2gen
p(correct)
Experiment 3 184 0.172 0.555 18.998 0.000 * 0.180
Condition 1 184 0.029 0.555 9.714 0.002 * 0.036
Trial Type 1 184 0.305 0.226 248.4 0.000 * 0.281
Experiment by Condition 3 184 0.035 0.555 3.858 0.010 * 0.043
Experiment by Trial Type 3 184 0.052 0.226 13.995 0.000 * 0.062
Condition by Trial Type 1 184 0.022 0.226 18.170 0.000 * 0.028
Experiment:Condition:Trial Type 3 184 0.007 0.226 2.007 0.115 0.009
RT
Experiment 3 184 1,208,409 5,609,615 13.212 0.000 * 0.173
Condition 1 184 149,897 5,609,615 4.917 0.028 * 0.025
Trial Type 1 184 1,165,417 162,309 1321.2 0.000 * 0.168
Experiment by Condition 3 184 19,017 5,609,615 0.208 0.891 0.003
Experiment by Trial Type 3 184 44,102 162,309 16.665 0.000 * 0.008
Condition by Trial Type 1 184 34,192 162,309 38.762 0.000 * 0.006
Experiment:Condition:Trial Type 3 184 12,069 162,309 4.561 0.004 * 0.002