Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Mar 11.
Published in final edited form as: Curr Alzheimer Res. 2015;12(7):640–647. doi: 10.2174/1567205012666150701102325

Table 2.

Results of Multivariable Linear Regressions Examining the association of increasing MetS criteria on affect and cognition.

Affect Cognition

Variables CES-D
B (SE)
LRN
B (SE)
MEM
B (SE)
ExFx
B (SE)
African American (vs White) 1.02 (1.24) −0.16 (0.18) −0.27 (0.17) −0.02 (0.14)
MetS Criteria Met
 1–2 vs 0 1.97 (1.12)T −0.39 (0.16)* −0.48 (0.16)** −0.24 (0.13)T
 3+ vs 0 4.73 (1.23)*** −0.42 (0.19)* −0.50 (0.18)** −0.12 (0.15)
 3+ vs 1–2 2.75 (0.89)** −0.03 (0.13) −0.02 (0.13) 0.12 (0.10)

NOTE:

***

p<0.001;

**

p<0.01;

*

p<0.05;

T

p>0.05 and p≤0.10;

MetS=Metabolic Syndrome; 0=no risk, 1–2=low risk, 3+=high risk; CES-D=Center for Epidemiologic Studies of Depression; LRN=composite z-score for Learning; MEM=composite z-score for Memory; ExFx=composite z-score for Executive Functioning. All analyses are adjusted for age, race, and pVIQ.

Cognitive outcomes were also adjusted for the CES-D.