Table 2.
Results of Multivariable Linear Regressions Examining the association of increasing MetS criteria on affect and cognition.
Affect | Cognition‡ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||
Variables | CES-D B (SE) |
LRN B (SE) |
MEM B (SE) |
ExFx B (SE) |
African American (vs White) | 1.02 (1.24) | −0.16 (0.18) | −0.27 (0.17) | −0.02 (0.14) |
MetS Criteria Met | ||||
1–2 vs 0 | 1.97 (1.12)T | −0.39 (0.16)* | −0.48 (0.16)** | −0.24 (0.13)T |
3+ vs 0 | 4.73 (1.23)*** | −0.42 (0.19)* | −0.50 (0.18)** | −0.12 (0.15) |
3+ vs 1–2 | 2.75 (0.89)** | −0.03 (0.13) | −0.02 (0.13) | 0.12 (0.10) |
NOTE:
p<0.001;
p<0.01;
p<0.05;
p>0.05 and p≤0.10;
MetS=Metabolic Syndrome; 0=no risk, 1–2=low risk, 3+=high risk; CES-D=Center for Epidemiologic Studies of Depression; LRN=composite z-score for Learning; MEM=composite z-score for Memory; ExFx=composite z-score for Executive Functioning. All analyses are adjusted for age, race, and pVIQ.
Cognitive outcomes were also adjusted for the CES-D.