Skip to main content
. 2015 Jul 14;22(Pt 5):1268–1278. doi: 10.1107/S1600577515010176

Figure 2.

Figure 2

First test case. (a) Original phantom. (b) Result of filtered back-projection after adding constant lines in the sinogram. (c) Image back-projected after applying the Munch et al. de-striper algorithm with Inline graphic = 3.5, Inline graphic = 2 and the ‘Daubechies 15’ wavelet. (d) Difference between the phantom and the corrected image. The PSNR is 26.6. (e) Result of the correction with the RCP technique with Inline graphic = 10 and Inline graphic = 10. (f) Difference between the phantom and the corrected image. The PSNR is 29.6. (g) Result of the reconstruction using the Total Variation regularization, with parameters Inline graphic = 0.5, Inline graphic = 0.05. (h) Difference between the phantom and the corrected image. The PSNR is 39.0. (i) Result of the reconstruction using the Dictionary Learning technique with Inline graphic = 0.3, Inline graphic = 0.5, Inline graphic = 1. (j) Difference between the phantom and the reconstructed image. The PSNR is 29.2.