Skip to main content
. 2015 Jul 14;22(Pt 5):1268–1278. doi: 10.1107/S1600577515010176

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Second test case.(a) Original phantom. (b) Result of filtered back-projection after adding lines of variable width and intensity in the sinogram. (c) Image back-projected after applying the Munch et al. de-striper algorithm, with Inline graphic = 1.5, Inline graphic = 2 and the ‘Daubechies 15’ wavelet. (d) Difference between the phantom and the corrected image. The PSNR is 29.2. (e) Result of the correction using the RCP technique with Inline graphic = 10 and Inline graphic = 10. (f) Difference between the phantom and the corrected image. The PSNR is 25.1. (g) Result of the reconstruction using the Total Variation regularization, with parameters Inline graphic = 0.5, Inline graphic = 0.05. (h) Difference between the phantom and the corrected image. The PSNR is 39.4. (i) Result of the reconstruction using the Dictionary Learning technique with Inline graphic = 0.7, Inline graphic = 0.5, Inline graphic = 1. (j) Difference between the phantom and the reconstructed image. The PSNR is 30.6.