Skip to main content
. 2015 Jul 14;22(Pt 5):1268–1278. doi: 10.1107/S1600577515010176

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Third test case. (a) Original phantom. (b) Result of filtered back-projection after adding lines of variable width and intensity in the sinogram. (c) Image back-projected after applying the Munch et al. de-striper algorithm, with Inline graphic = 2.5, Inline graphic = 5 and the ‘Daubechies 20’ wavelet. (d) Difference between the phantom and the corrected image. The PSNR is 23.2. (e) Result of the correction using the RCP technique, with Inline graphic = 10 and Inline graphic = 10. (f) Difference between the phantom and the corrected image. The PSNR is 21.2. (g) Result of the reconstruction using the Total Variation regularization, with parameters Inline graphic = 0.5, Inline graphic = 0.05. (h) Difference between the phantom and the corrected image. The PSNR is 29.9. (i) Result of the reconstruction using the Dictionary Learning technique with parameters Inline graphic = 0.05, Inline graphic = Inline graphic, Inline graphic = 10. (j) Difference between the reconstruction and the phantom. The PSNR is 28.3.