Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Soc Sci Med. 2016 Feb 2;153:35–43. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.02.002

Table 2.

Network-level compositional and structural characteristics (n=59)

Characteristic Mean SD Range
 Networks size 32.6 12.4 20 – 77
 Number of responders 25.3 10.8 7 – 66
 Number male responders 21.2 8.9 7 – 40
 Number female responders 4.1 4.9 0 – 26
 Response rate within networks 78.1 17.8 25 – 100
Compositional characteristics
 % male network members 84.8 15.3 33.3 - 100
 Avg. age of network members 26.0 4.4 17.5 - 38.7
 % network members that are currently students 11.3 11.5 0 - 40.7
 % camp members who have ever been married 23.8 19.1 0 - 88.9
 Avg. duration of camp membership in years 5.7 1.9 1.9 - 9.5
Structural network characteristics
 Number of ties (known relationships) 459.9 376.3 71.0 – 1722.0
 Density 0.43 0.20 0.09 - 0.89
 Reciprocity 0.43 0.19 0.08 - 0.88
 Transitivity 0.70 0.19 0.20 - 0.99
 Degree centralization 0.34 0.10 0.06 - 0.50
 % friendship ties 74.4 21.8 26.5 - 100
 % acquaintance ties 24.6 21.1 0 - 73.5
 % negative ties 0.8 1.4 0 - 5.3