Table 2.
Characteristic | Mean | SD | Range |
---|---|---|---|
Networks size | 32.6 | 12.4 | 20 – 77 |
Number of responders | 25.3 | 10.8 | 7 – 66 |
Number male responders | 21.2 | 8.9 | 7 – 40 |
Number female responders | 4.1 | 4.9 | 0 – 26 |
Response rate within networks | 78.1 | 17.8 | 25 – 100 |
Compositional characteristics | |||
% male network members | 84.8 | 15.3 | 33.3 - 100 |
Avg. age of network members | 26.0 | 4.4 | 17.5 - 38.7 |
% network members that are currently students | 11.3 | 11.5 | 0 - 40.7 |
% camp members who have ever been married | 23.8 | 19.1 | 0 - 88.9 |
Avg. duration of camp membership in years | 5.7 | 1.9 | 1.9 - 9.5 |
Structural network characteristics | |||
Number of ties (known relationships) | 459.9 | 376.3 | 71.0 – 1722.0 |
Density | 0.43 | 0.20 | 0.09 - 0.89 |
Reciprocity | 0.43 | 0.19 | 0.08 - 0.88 |
Transitivity | 0.70 | 0.19 | 0.20 - 0.99 |
Degree centralization | 0.34 | 0.10 | 0.06 - 0.50 |
% friendship ties | 74.4 | 21.8 | 26.5 - 100 |
% acquaintance ties | 24.6 | 21.1 | 0 - 73.5 |
% negative ties | 0.8 | 1.4 | 0 - 5.3 |