Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Hear Res. 2015 Sep 11;333:216–224. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2015.09.001

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

For each subject and for the average across all subjects, the Xs identify the percent reduction in cochlear-nerve compound action potential (CAP) amplitudes produced by broadband noise contralateral acoustic stimulation (CAS). Negative values indicate that CAS reduced the CAP amplitudes. The vertical bars show the 95% confidence intervals for the null distribution, i.e., for the assumption that the without-CAS and with-CAS runs produced no difference in CAP amplitude.