Skip to main content
. 2015 Nov 6;29(2):254–263. doi: 10.1007/s10278-015-9844-y

Table 3.

Prostate segmentation average results (±standard deviation) using the SRS algorithm with rigid registration for 15 patients contoured by 5 users, which includes DSC for the entire volume (%), volume ratio, MAD (mm), MAXD (mm), timesaving (%), and speedup factor. “i” in “Unedited i” that represents the number of unedited slices in between any two slices that have been manually contoured

Unedited slices Volume (DSC) (%) Volume (ratio) (%) MAD (mm) MAXD (mm) Timesaving (%) Speedup
Unedited 0 94.35 ± 7.30 91.38 ± 4.46 1.08 ± 0.42 3.39 ± 0.88 27.46 1.38×
Unedited 1 92.73 ± 7.76 91.33 ± 5.04 1.39 ± 0.43 3.95 ± 0.92 46.56 1.87×
Unedited 2 90.96 ± 12.36 90.65 ± 5.10 1.79 ± 0.46 4.63 ± 0.89 62.19 2.64×
Unedited 3 89.31 ± 15.44 88.42 ± 5.96 2.26 ± 0.52 5.56 ± 0.96 69.96 3.33×
Unedited 4 85.15 ± 17.17 83.93 ± 7.67 2.69 ± 0.67 6.33 ± 1.11 74.13 3.87×
Unedited 5 77.15 ± 18.62 80.50 ± 9.62 3.31 ± 0.87 7.41 ± 1.35 77.73 4.49×