Skip to main content
. 2016 Mar 11;22:72. doi: 10.1007/s00894-016-2933-0

Table 4.

Comparative analysis of ab initio methods of protein domain boundary prediction

Predictor name and reference Training data Domain boundary annotation Test data and results
PPRODO [7] Nonredundant set of 522 proteins Domain boundary is considered to be ± 20 residues from the true domain boundary; these residues are considered to be positive. The other (nonboundary, i.e., domain) residues are considered to be negative. CASP-5
10-fold cross-validation experiment
Aaccuracy of about 66 %
DOMPro [8] CATH (2.5.0) CAFASP-4
Specificity 0.71
Sensitivity 0.71
DROP [17] DS-All Linker (nondomain) predictor. CASP8
NDO score: 0.76
Dobo [16] CATH(3.3.0) Domain-boundary definitions from PSI-BLAST CASP9
Multidomain
Recall: 0.72
Precision: 0.68
Accuracy: 0.82
Current work: PDP-CON (1-star consensus SVM) CATH (2.5.1) True domain definitions obtained from CATH (2.5.1) Accuracy:
CASP8: 0.91
CASP9: 0.90
CASP10: 0.79
(see Table 3 for details)
Current work: MLP-1 (with k = 20) CATH (2.5.1) Domain boundary is considered to be ± 20 residues from the domain definition obtained from CATH (2.5.1); domain boundary residues vare considered to be positive and the other (domain) residues are negative Recall:
CASP8: 0.94
CASP9: 0.94
CASP10: 0.96
(see Table 5 for details)