Skip to main content
. 2016 Mar 16;98(6):466–474. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.O.00705

TABLE I.

Comparison of Outcome Parameters Between the Standard Locking Plate Group and the Active Locking Plate Group

Parameters Standard Locking Plate Group* Active Locking Plate Group* Difference P Value
Sheep characteristics
 Weight (kg) 71 ± 9 65 ± 5 −8% 0.21
 Age (mo) 24 ± 1 25 ± 2 1% 0.58
Construct stiffness (N/mm)
 In compression ≤700 N 6239 ± 740 667 ± 161 −89% <0.001
 In compression >700 N 5023 ± 420 1805 ± 116 −64% <0.001
Callus volume from tomography scans (cm3)
 Total 6.0 ± 1.8 13.0 ± 2.7 117% <0.001
 Anterior 1.3 ± 0.9 4.5 ± 2.0 252% 0.006
 Posterior 1.0 ± 0.6 2.5 ± 0.8 147% 0.004
 Lateral 3.0 ± 0.5 4.4 ± 0.5 46% <0.001
Mechanical properties, absolute
 Peak torsion (Nm) 28 ± 25 72 ± 9 157% 0.006
 Rotation to failure (deg) 7 ± 2 16 ± 1 131% <0.001
 Energy to failure (Nm × deg) 134 ± 152 669 ± 105 399% <0.001
Mechanical properties, normalized
 Peak torsion (Nm) 34 ± 30 87 ± 11 156% 0.003
 Rotation to failure (deg) 42 ± 12 92 ± 8 119% <0.001
 Energy to failure (Nm × deg) 17 ± 17 81 ± 9 371% <0.001
Mechanical properties, contralateral§
 Peak torsion (Nm) 80 ± 12 83 ± 11 4% 0.62
 Rotation to failure (deg) 16 ± 2 17 ± 1 8% 0.21
 Energy to failure (Nm × deg) 738 ± 156 825 ± 108 12% 0.30
*

The values are given as the mean and the standard deviation.

These results represent the area under the torsion-rotation curve.

These values were the percentage of the contralateral tibiae.

§

These values were for the contralateral tibiae of the standard locking plate and active locking plate groups, provided for reference only.