Skip to main content
. 2016 Mar 12;16:123. doi: 10.1186/s12879-016-1450-1

Table 5.

Sensitivity and specificity of conventional methods, nMPCR assay and CRS with respect to different specimens

Different testes Test results TB group Control (n = 150) Sensitivity (%) Specificity (%) PPV (%) NPV (%) CI
Pulmonary TB (n = 535)
AFB smear Positive
Negative
287
128
0
120
69.2 100 100 48.4 64.5 % – 73.6 %
Culture Positive
Negative
329
86
0
120
79.3 100 100 58.2 75.0 % – 83.1 %
Single step mPCR Positive
Negative
345
70
0
120
83.1 100 100 63.2 79.2 % – 86.6 %
nMPCR Positive
Negative
403
12
0
120
97.1 100 100 90.9 95.0 % – 98.5 %
CRS Positive
Negative
415
0
0
120
100 100 100 100 99.1 % –100.0 %
Extra-pulmonary TB (n = 65)
Z-N smear Positive
Negative
15
20
-
30
42.9 100 100 60.0 26.3 % – 60.6 %
Culture Positive
Negative
19
16
-
30
54.3 100 100 65.2 36.6 % – 71.2 %
Single step mPCR Positive
Negative
20
15
-
30
57.1 100 100 66.7 39.3 % – 73.7 %
nMPCR Positive
Negative
32
3
2
28
91.4 93.3 94.1 90.3 76.9 % – 98.2 %
CRS Positive
Negative
35
0
0
30
100 100 100 100 90.0 % to 100.0 %

PPV positive predictive value, NPV negative predictive value, TB group TB suspected patients, mPCR multiplex PCR, nMPCR nested multiplex PCR, CRS composite reference standard