Table 1.
Characteristics of SAP, UAP, and AMI patients and controls.
| Basic information | Control (n = 36) | SAP (n = 46) | UAP (n = 54) | AMI (n = 42) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ages (years) | 62.00 ± 10.93 | 73.13 ± 8.25 | 73.24 ± 9.06 | 66.85 ± 11.52 |
| Gender (M/F) | 26/10 | 35/11 | 40/14 | 32/10 |
| Smoking (Y/N) | 12/24 | 31/15 | 34/20 | 27/15 |
| Diabetes (Y/N) | 5/31 | 10/36 | 21/33 | 12/30 |
| Hypertension (Y/N) | 11/25 | 24/22 | 40/14 | 30/12 |
| Dyslipidemia (Y/N) | 16/20 | 27/19 | 39/15 | 28/14 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 23.29 ± 2.57 | 25.18 ± 3.12 | 25.82 ± 3.64 | 24.65 ± 1.87 |
| WBC (×109/L) | 5.18 ± 0.81 | 5.83 ± 1.63 | 6.04 ± 2.09∗ | 8.45 ± 4.85∗#△ |
| ESR (mm/h) | 8.20 ± 3.33 | 14.46 ± 5.45 | 20.34 ± 6.52 | 29.00 ± 7.47∗ |
| FBS (mmol/L) | 5.29 ± 0.99 | 5.44 ± 1.00 | 5.74 ± 1.23 | 6.37 ± 1.77∗ |
| HbA1C (%) | 5.80 ± 0.26 | 6.60 ± 1.03 | 9.23 ± 1.66 | 7.63 ± 1.71 |
| TG (mmol/L) | 1.57 ± 0.28 | 1.54 ± 0.17 | 1.64 ± 0.20 | 1.99 ± 0.65 |
| TC (mmol/L) | 4.60 ± 1.16 | 4.12 ± 0.81 | 3.71 ± 1.31 | 3.99 ± 0.96 |
| HDL-C (mmol/L) | 1.74 ± 0.10 | 1.49 ± 0.36 | 1.46 ± 0.39 | 1.30 ± 0.31∗ |
| LDL-C (mmol/L) | 2.52 ± 10.97 | 2.07 ± 0.67 | 1.64 ± 0.80∗ | 1.90 ± 0.73 |
| APOA1 (g/L) | 1.47 ± 0.16 | 1.34 ± 0.22 | 1.27 ± 0.20∗ | 1.16 ± 0.20∗ |
| UA (μmol/L) | 298.60 ± 66.12 | 338.92 ± 108.33 | 320.53 ± 98.60 | 359.70 ± 96.02 |
| Cr (μmol/L) | 57.56 ± 9.27 | 75.79 ± 29.67 | 78.18 ± 30.80 | 77.05 ± 32.91 |
| BUN (mmol/L) | 6.22 ± 1.34 | 6.20 ± 1.31 | 6.51 ± 180 | 7.62 ± 5.21 |
AMI, acute myocardial infarction; UAP, unstable angina pectoris; SAP, stable angina pectoris; BMI, body mass index; WBC, white blood cell; FBS, fasting blood sugar; TC, total cholesterol; TG, triglyceride; HDL-C, high density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C, low density lipoprotein cholesterol; APOA: Apolipoprotein; UA, uric acid; Cr, creatinine; BUN, blood urea nitrogen; CK-MB, creatine kinase isoenzyme MB fraction; CRP, C-reactive protein; TnI, Troponin I; MRP8/14, Myeloid-Related Protein 8/14; ECP, eosinophil cationic protein.
P value was the comparing results of the 4 groups.
∗ P < 0.05 compared with the control group; # P < 0.05 compared with the SAP group; △ P < 0.05 compared with the UAP group.