Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Mar 14.
Published in final edited form as: Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2015 Jan 22;21(5):866–872. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2015.01.017

Table 4. The effects of cytogenetic scoring system groupings on alloHCT outcomes adjusted for donor type, conditioning and baseline Karnofsky.

Time Cytogenetic scoring systems Cytogenetic Risk Score NRM at 3 years P-value Relapse at 3 years P-value DFS at 3 years P-value OS at 3 years P-value
AT DIAGNOSIS IPSS Good 22%(8-36%) 0.01 21%(8-34%) 0.28 59%(43-73%) <0.01 67%(51-83%) <0.01
Intermediate 55%(45-65%) 35%(17-53%) 11%(1-23%) 16%(4-30%)
Poor 42%(28-56%) 26%(15-37%) 32%(20-44%) 37%(24-50%)
R-IPSS Very Good/Good 21%(7-35%) <0.01 23%(9-37%) 0.02 57%(41-73%) <0.01 66%(50-82%) <0.01
Intermediate 59%(38-80%) 36%(17-55%) 8%(1-19%) 19%(3-35%)
Poor 47%(29-65%) 10%(1-21%) 41%(24-58%) 44%(26-62%)
Very Poor 35%(16-54%) 39%(22-56%) 24%(7-41%) 27%(11-44%)
TSCG Standard 36%(24-48%) 0.29 28%(17-39%) 0.98 37%(25-49%) 0.36 44%(31-57%) 0.28
Adverse 44%(31-57%) 26%(15-37%) 31%(19-43%) 36%(24-48%)
MK No 40%(29-51%) 0.96 23%(14-32%) 0.02 39%(28-50%) 0.01 47%(36-59%) 0.02
Yes 35%(19-51%) 38%(23-43%) 27%(12-42%) 29%(14-44%)
AT ALLOHCT IPSS Good 27%(13-41%) 0.19 27%(14-40%) 0.86 47%(32-62%) 0.09 57%(42-72%) <0.01
Intermediate 56%(36-76%) 29%(12-46%) 19%(4-34%) 22%(6-38%)
Poor 43%(29-57%) 25%(13-37%) 32%(19-45%) 36%(22-50%)
R-IPSS Very Good/Good 27%(13-31%) 0.23 29%(16-52%) 0.84 45%(30-60%) 0.02 56%(41-71%) <0.01
Intermediate 59%(39-79%) 27%(10-44%) 18%(3-33%) 24%(6-42%)
Poor 37%(17-57%) 18%(2-34%) 44%(23-65%) 49%(29-69%)
Very Poor 46%(26-66%) 31%(14-47%) 24%(6-42%) 23%(6-40%)
TSCG Standard 40%(28-52%) 0.51 27%(17-37%) 0.73 36%(24-48%) 0.27 42%(31-54%)53%) 0.34
Adverse 41%(27-54%) 28%(16-40%) 32%(19-45%) 38%(24-52%)
MK No 41%(31-51%) 0.85 25%(16-34%) 0.17 36%(26-46%) 0.10 43%(33-53%) 0.08
Yes 39%(21-60%) 34%(18-50%) 28%(12-44%) 31%(14-48%)