Skip to main content
. 2016 Feb 9;25(4):943–958. doi: 10.1111/mec.13520

Table 3.

Differentially expressed genes between lake and river populations also found as differentially expressed in previous parasite infection studies

Gene ID Gene name Comparisons in Lenz et al. 2013, a Tissue in Lenz et al. 2013 Log fold‐change in Lenz et al. 2013, b  Tissue in this study Log fold‐change in this studyc FDR in this study
ENSGACG00000011746 fyco1a
FYVE and coiled‐coil domain containing 1a
Control vs. infected Head kidney −3.21 Head kidney 0.71 0.0096
ENSGACG00000010806 sox7
SRY‐box containing gene 7
Control vs. infected Head kidney −2.58 Head kidney 0.74 0.038
ENSGACG00000013129 MRPL49 (2 of 2) mitochondrial ribosomal protein L49 Control vs. infected Head kidney −2.69 Head kidney −0.91 0.017
ENSGACG00000015653 lmo1
LIM domain only 1
Control vs. infected Head kidney −1.20 Head kidney 1.13 0.033
ENSGACG00000014705 mettl13
Methyltransferase‐like 13
Lake vs. River in 2nd infection; control vs. infected Head kidney −4.4 and −2.69 Spleen −0.63 0.028
ENSGACG00000011977 ppdpfa
Pancreatic progenitor cell differentiation and proliferation factor a
Control vs. infected Head kidney 1.03 Spleen 3.17 0.011
ENSGACG00000001923 n6amt2
N‐6 adenine‐specific DNA methyltransferase 2
Control vs. infected Head kidney 1.56 Spleen −0.88 0.025
ENSGACG00000004515 Cfd
Complement factor D (adipsin)
Control vs. infected Head kidney −1.48 Spleen 1.16 0.00065
ENSGACG00000012609 LGALS1 (2 of 3) lectin, galactoside binding, soluble, 1 Control vs. infected Head kidney −5.09 Spleen 0.73 0.0038
ENSGACG00000011683 slc5a6b
Solute carrier family 5, member 6
Control vs. infected Head kidney −2.46 Spleen −0.45 0.045
Gene ID Gene name Comparisons in Haase et al. 2014, a Tissue in Haase et al. 2014 Log fold‐change in Haase et al. 2014, b  Tissue in this study Log fold‐change in this studyc  FDR
ENSGACG00000003716 CASQ2 (1 of 2) calsequestrin 2 Control vs. clone XII Head kidney 2.8 Spleen −0.97 0.0080
ENSGACG00000017615 Smox
Spermine oxidase
Control vs. clone I, control vs. XII and control vs. clone mix Head kidney 4.79, 5.81 and 5.11 Spleen 0.65 0.011
ENSGACG00000011977 ppdpfa
Pancreatic progenitor cell differentiation and proliferation factor a
Control vs. clone I Head kidney −4.08 Spleen 3.17 0.011
ENSGACG00000004966 IRF4 (2 of 2) interferon regulatory factor 4b Control vs. clone I, control vs. XII and control vs. clone mix Head kidney 1.41, 2.26 and 1.79 Spleen −0.59 0.028
ENSGACG00000020628 angptl5
Angiopoietin‐like 5
Control vs. clone mix Head kidney 2.83 Spleen 0.71 0.028
ENSGACG00000017656 SVIL (2 of 2) supervillin Control vs. clone mix Head kidney 2.96 Spleen 0.59 0.040
ENSGACG00000008510 apnl
Actinoporin‐like protein
Control vs. clone mix Gill −1.20 Head kidney and spleen 0.88 and 1.05 0.0093 and 0.0030

For the DE genes Haase et al. 2014 identified in gill, only the overlapped DE genes we identified in both head kidney and spleen are shown.

a

Comparisons where the genes were previously identified as differentially expressed are indicated. In Lenz et al. 2013; DE gene sets between control naïve fish from lake and from river, between twice exposed fish from lake and from river (2nd infection), and between infected fish and control fish were compared to DE gene sets in this study. In Haase et al. 2014, DE gene sets between control fish and infected fish with different parasite clones were compared.

b

In lake‐river comparisons, positive log fold‐change values represent higher expression in lake fish and vice versa. In control‐infection comparisons, positive values represent upregulation with infection compared to control.

c

Positive log fold‐change values represent higher expression in lake fish and vice versa.