Skip to main content
. 2016 Mar 14;11(3):e0151276. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0151276

Table 3. Antioxidant capacity of Meili grapes and wines at different density levels.

Density level DPPH CUPRAC HRSA
skin(μM TE g-1)α seed(μM TE g-1) wine(μM TE L-1) skin(μM TE g-1) seed(μM TE g-1) wine(μM TE L-1) skin(%) seed(%) wine(%)
D3 209.18±5.13(a)β 531.20±9.27(a) 4380±19(a) 78.36±5.20(a) 676.23±21.94(a) 5438±22(a) 24.61±3.46(a) 41.04±3.63(a) 45.85±4.65(a)
D4 210.09±5.01(a) 535.69±11.18(a) 4850±24(b) 90.79±4.61(a) 691.05±4.47(a) 5918±18(b) 27.65±3.55(b) 41.71±3.34(a) 52.24±4.83(b)
D5 225.51±5.31(b) 549.00±8.35(b) 5140±15(c) 114.96±6.68(b) 756.42±19.12(b) 7009±21(c) 34.35±3.69(c) 48.90±4.20(b) 59.59±5.4(c)

α TE: trolox equivalents.

β Values are the mean ± standard deviation (n = 3) and are based on the fresh weight of skin and seed, respectively. Within columns, significant differences according to the Fisher’s LSD test at the P ≤ 0.05 level are indicated by different letters.