Skip to main content
. 2016 Mar 14;11(3):e0151000. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0151000

Table 5. Comparison of the strength of structure-function relationship between visual field measurement instruments.

location Statistic MAIA MP-3 HFA
Global Correlation coefficient 0.627 0.633 0.682
95% bootstrapped CI 0.515–0.750 0.526–0.732 0.601–0.767
Superior henifield Correlation coefficient 0.547 0.567 0.602
95% bootstrapped CI 0.419–0.676 0.454–0.672 0.508–0.721
Inferior hemifield Correlation coefficient 0.656 0.687 0.642
95% bootstrapped CI 0.551–0.756 0.583–0.774 0.585–0.757
Superotemporal Correlation coefficient 0.592 0.603 0.672
95% bootstrapped CI 0.447–0.691 0.492–0.714 0.570–0.772
Superior Correlation coefficient 0.426 0.46 0.517
95% bootstrapped CI 0.275–0.560 0.333–0.577 0.382–0.632
Superonasal Correlation coefficient 0.417 0.424 0.408
95% bootstrapped CI 0.265–0.572 0.272–0.554 0.257–0.548
Inferotemporal Correlation coefficient 0.673 0.691 0.718
95% bootstrapped CI 0.523–0.767 0.590–0.784 0.623–0.807
Inferior Correlation coefficient 0.631 0.67 0.651
95% bootstrapped CI 0.539–0.719 0.569–0.755 0.560–0.730
Inferonasal Correlation coefficient 0.579 0.616 0.587
95% bootstrapped CI 0.452–0.716 0.509–0.718 0.485–0.681

CI: confidential interval.