Abstract
Background
Streptococcus suis is an important swine pathogen and zoonotic agent. Infection with this highly pathogenic strain can cause streptococcal toxic shock-like syndrome (STSLS), characterized by a Th-1 inflammatory cytokine storm, and a high mortality rate. Monocyte derived dendritic cells (MoDCs) are known to stimulate Th-1 cell differentiation, but the role of MoDCs in STSLS remains to be elucidated.
Methodology and Findings
Porcine CD14-positive monocytes, purified from peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs), were used to generate MoDCs using granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and interleukin-4 (IL-4). Highly pure MoDCs were generated, as proved by their morphology, phenotype analysis, phagocytic ability, and induction of T cells proliferation. The MoDCs were further stimulated by the virulent S. suis serotype 2 (SS2) SC19 strain which triggered a strong release of several pro-inflammatory cytokines, including IL-1β, IL-8, TNF-α, IFN-γ, and IL-12. Furthermore, the stimulated MoDCs induced CD4+ T cell differentiation towards Th-1 cells in vitro.
Conclusions
The results of this study indicated that the porcine MoDCs stimulated by SS2 could release high levels of Th-1 inflammatory cytokines and induce CD4+ T cell differentiation towards Th-1 cells. Hence, it is likely that porcine MoDCs play an important role in the STSLS caused by SS2.
Introduction
Streptococcus suis (S.suis) is a major swine pathogen, causing considerable economic losses and animal health care problems in the pig farming industry worldwide [1]. S.suis infection causes several diseases, including meningitis and septicemia—the main causes of mortality with this infection. S.suis is also an emerging serious zoonotic pathogen of humans, particularly in Asia [2, 3].
The capsule is the most important virulence factor in S.suis [4]. Out of the 33 serotypes of S.suis, serotype 2 (SS2) is the most common and most virulent serotype. It is associated with diseases in humans and pigs in most of the countries [5, 6]. In 2005, a large outbreak of human SS2 infection occurred in Sichuan, China, resulting in 215 infections and 38 deaths [7]. During this outbreak, some people presented with streptococcal toxic shock-like syndrome (STSLS) and more than 80% of the patients died in spite of treatment with antibiotics [8,9]. Furthermore, the clinical surveys indicated that the patients who died had high levels of the Th-1 inflammatory cytokines in their serum. Subsequent studies have confirmed that extremely high levels of the Th-1 inflammatory cytokines are an important characteristic of STSLS [10].
Monocyte derived dendritic cells (MoDCs) can stimulate Th-1 cell differentiation. Dendritic cells (DCs) can be activated by invading microbes. Activated DCs produce various cytokines that can regulate inflammation and direct the differentiation of the CD4+ T cells [11, 12, 13, 14]. However, the role of MoDCs in the Th-1 response to SS2 infection is still unknown. Therefore, the present study aimed to examine the role of MoDCs in the Th-1 response to SS2 infection.
Results
Identification of porcine MoDCs
The CD14+ monocytes purified from porcine peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were small and round after being directionally cultured for two days (Fig 1A). After three days, most of the cells were big and veiled (Fig 1B). At the fourth and fifth day of culture, the cells were semi-suspended, and were characterized by a veiled morphology, that is typical of DCs (Fig 1C and 1D).
After being directionally cultured for five days, flow cytometric analysis showed that CD1 expression on the CD14+ monocytes was low (20.14%~33.90%) while swine leukocyte antigen II (SLA-II) and CD172a expression was high (86.63%, 92.81%) (Fig 2), as has been previously reported to be characteristic of MoDCs [15].
Flow cytometry analysis of S.suis-infected MoDCs
The mature of MoDCs infected with S. suis was evaluated by Flow cytometry analysis. During the analysis, Pam3CSK4 and LPS, which are typical pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) of Gram-positive or negative bacteria respectively, were used as positive controls of promoting DCs maturation. The assay indicated that 6-day old MoDCs were treated with SC19 [multiplicity of infection (MOI = 0.1] for 24 h, and their CD1 expression was found to be down-regulated by about 25%, while CD172a and SLA-II expression remained stable (Fig 3), suggesting that SC19 promoted the maturation of MoDCs.
Phagocytic ability of MoDCs treated with neutral red
To further examine whether SC19 could promote the maturation of MoDCs, the phagocytic ability of MoDCs for neutral red was tested. Phagocytic ability of the CD14+ monocytes at different culture times was tested, and it was found that the phagocytic ability of the cells increased until day 6, and then started to decrease (Fig 4A), which is a known characteristic of MoDCs and also indicated that most porcine MoDCs are immature before day 6. So, the 6-day old MoDCs were selected to be stimulated by SC19 for two days, the phagocytic ability of the stimulated MoDCs decreased by 35.2% (Fig 4B), suggesting that SC19 (MOI = 0.1) can promote the maturation of MoDCs.
Proliferation of T cells stimulated by SS2-treated MoDCs
When T cells were co-cultured with pre-treated MoDCs for three days, the Stimulation Index (SI) of the T cells being co-cultured with SC19-stimulated MoDCs was higher than that of those being co-cultured with control and lipopolysaccharide (LPS) -stimulated MoDCs. Moreover, the SI showed a dose-response relationship, (Fig 5) suggesting that the SC19-stimulated MoDCs can enhance the proliferation of T cells.
Cytokine production in MoDCs stimulated by SC19
The levels of IL-1β, IL-4, IL-6, IL-10, IL-12, tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), Interferon-γ (IFN-γ), transforming growth factor beta (TGF-β), and GM-CSF in the supernatants of the SC19-stimulated MoDCs were measured at 12 and 24 h after stimulation and the results are shown in Fig 6. The SC19-stimulated MoDCs produced a significant amount of Th-1 inducing cytokine (IL-12) and the amount produced followed a dose-response curve. IL-12 is known to induce Th-1 cells differentiation. Thus, the results indicate that the SC19-stimulated MoDCs can induce Th-1 polarization. The levels of GM-CSF and IFN-γ were up-regulated and showed a dose-response relationship with SC19 stimulation, suggesting that the SC19 -stimulated MoDCs can promote Th-1cells amplification.
Pro-inflammatory cytokines like the IL-1β, IFN-γ, TNF-α, and IL-8 (except IL-6), released by the SC19-stimulated MoDCs were much higher (2–100 fold) than that by control and showed a dose-response relationship with SC19. It should be noted that IL-6 was not up-regulated by SC19 at all.
On the other hand, levels of TGF-β1 and IL-10 released by the SC19-stimulated MoDCs were too low to be detected. It is well known that inflammation can be suppressed by TGF-β1 and IL-10. Hence, our results suggest that the inflammation caused by SC19 was not under control. The level of IL-4 was down-regulated by SC19 in a dose dependent manner at 12 h, and remained stable at 24 h except by SC19 (MOI = 0.001), that indicated that the MoDCs stimulated by SC19 did not induce Th-2 polarization.
CD4+ T cell differentiation response to SC19-stimulated MoDCs
CD4+ T cells were purified from PBMCs by magnetic activated cell sorting to obtain CD4+ T cells with greater than 98% purity (Fig 7).
When MoDCs mixed with CD4+ T cells were stimulated by SC19 (MOI = 0.1) for 12 h, the proportion of Th-1 (CD4+, IFN-γ+) cells increased by 55% (Fig 8A).Further, the proportion of Th-2 (CD4+, IL-4+) cells increased by 48.2% (Fig 8B). However, the absolute level of Th-2 cells was much lower than that of Th-1. The results indicated that the SC19-stimulated MoDCs could mainly induce Th-1 differentiation.
CD4+ T cells cytokine response to SC19-stimulated MoDCs
A mixture of MoDCs and CD4+ T cells was stimulated by SC19 (MOI = 0.1) for 17 h, and the levels of IL-4, IL-12p70, IL-17, and IFN-γ in the supernatants are shown in Fig 9. As expected, IL-12p70 was up-regulated by 51%, IFN-γ by 36% (based on the high basal level of 575 pg/mL), and IL-17 by more than 100%.
Compared with the results shown in Fig 6, it can be deduced that IFN-γ was mainly secreted by CD4+ T cells (Th-1 cells), and IL-12p70 was produced mainly by the MoDCs. The evident increase of IL-17 indicated that MoDCs might also induce Th-17 cells differentiation. IL-4 levels did not change noticeably. Thus, the results indicated that the SC19-stimulated MoDCs mainly induce Th-1 polarization.
Discussion
S.suis is increasingly being recognized as an important pathogen for swine and human health. Serotype 2 (SS2) is the most common and most virulent among the 33 serotypes of S.suis [16]. S.suis infection in humans typically produces a purulent or nonpurulent meningitis, endocarditis, cellulitis, peritonitis, rhabdomyolysis, arthritis, spondylodiscitis, pneumonia, uveitis, endophthalmitis, and occasionally septic shock [17, 18, 19]. SS2 infection can cause mortality even in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU), with exaggerated level of Th-1 immune response [10, 20]. It is well known that MoDCs can stimulate Th-1 cell differentiation, but its role in induction of high level of Th-1 immune responseduring SS2 infection remains unknown [21]. In this study, CD14+ monocytes were purified from porcine PBMCs, and further directionally cultured to obtain MoDCs [15, 22]. SC19 strain of S. Suis serotype 2 was selected to stimulate MoDCs.
Firstly, the purity of porcine PBMC derived MoDCs was ascertained by their morphology, surface markers, and phagocytic and T cell proliferation promotion ability.
As expected, the phagocytic ability of the MoDCs increased to the peak at day 6 of culture and then decreased, and the surface makers SLA-II and CD172 were found to be 86.63% and 92.81% respectively at day 5 of culture. However, CD1 expression ranged between 20.14% and 33.90% at day 5 of culture. This was much lower than expected, given the purity of the MoDCs, and was inconsistent with suggestion that CD1 expression represented the purity of porcine MoDCs [15, 23]. Hence, this study also indicateed that CD1 expression may vary according to the origin of the DCs.
Secondly, SC19 was used to stimulate 5-day old porcine MoDCs and the response was measured. It was found that SC19 had no effect on the expression of CD172 and SLA-II on MoDCs; this may due to the high basal level of CD172 and SLA-II of porcine MoDCs. SC19 stimulation could down-regulated the phagocytic ability of MoDCs and then promoted T cell proliferation through MoDCs. Hence, SC19 infection could promote the maturation of porcine MoDCs, and the matured MoDCs could then promote T cell immune response. We also measured pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL-1β, IFN-γ, TNF-α, and IL-8), anti-inflammatory cytokines (IL-10, TGF-β1, IL-4), and IL-12 in the supernatants of the SC19-stimulated MoDCs. We found that the SC19-stimulated MoDCs produced high levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines and Th-1 type cytokine (IL-12) at 12 and 24 h, implying that the SC19 treated MoDCs could promote Th-1 polarization and inflammatory response.
Finally, CD4+ T cells were co-cultured with the SC19-stimulated MoDCs, and Th-1 polarization was evaluated. We found that the Th-1 (CD4+, IFN-γ+) cells increased at 12 h, and the levels of IFN-γ, IL-17 and IL-12p70 increased markedly. This demonstrated that the SC19-stimulated MoDCs can indeed induce Th-1 differentiation. Therefore, the present study indicated that SS2 infection could induce the maturation of MoDCs, which further induce CD4+ T cell differentiation towards Th-1 cells.
Since, STSLS patients showed an exaggerated level of Th-1 immune response, and the SC19-stimulated MoDCs can also induce such a high level of Th-1-immune response, it led us to consider that MoDCs may play an important role in the severe inflammation caused by SC19 infection. Based on the data from this study, it is reasonable to believe that MoDCs contribute to STSLS in the following three respects:
The SC19-stimulated MoDCs produce high levels of inflammatory cytokines (IL-1β, IL-8, TNF-α, and IFN-γ). DC derived IL-8 and IFN-γ recruit neutrophils and macrophages to migrate to the sites of inflammation, and these cells secrete large amounts of pro-inflammatory cytokines, resulting in increased inflammation [24]. IL-1β and TNF-α secreted by DCs induce vasodilation, and inflammatory cells migrate to the site of inflammation faster [25].
The SC19-stimulated MoDCs induce Th-1 cell differentiation, and Th-2 cell differentiation is suppressed by Th-1 cells derived IFN-γ. The suppressed Th-2 immune response, therefore, cannot stop the inflammation mediated by Th-1 cells [14, 26], while macrophages activated by IFN-γ promote inflammation [27].
The SC19-stimulated MoDCs produce a small amount of IL-10 and TGF-β1which suppress inflammation. The lack of IL-10 and TGF-β1 resulted in uncontrolled inflammation [28].
The SC19-stimulated MoDCs exaggerate inflammatory response and cause severe inflammation, which can further result in serious damage of tissues and organs, and finally the death of the host [29]. The interaction of physical and chemical factors is much more complex in vivo, and the real contribution of MoDCs to the inflammation storm and its relationship with other immune cells needs further experiments to be understood better.
Materials and Methods
Bacterial strain and growth conditions
SC19 is a highly virulent strain of SS2, originally isolated from a pig infected by S. suis in Ziyang, Sichuan [30]. SC19 was grown on Tryptic Soy Agar (TSA) plates at 37°C. Isolated colonies were used as inocula for Todd-Hewitt Broth (THB) with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), and were incubated for 8 h at 37°C with shaking. Working cultures were obtained by inoculating 100 μL of these cultures in 30 mL of THB and incubating for 16 h at 37°C with shaking. The number of CFU/mL in the final suspension was determined by spread plate method on Todd-Hewitt Agar (THA). Bacteria were washed twice in phosphate-buffered saline (1×PBS, pH 7.3) and were pre-opsonized using 20% fresh complete normal pig serum in 1×PBS (pH 7.3)[31]. Opsonization was performed for 30 min at 37°C with shaking. Bacteria were washed twice and appropriately diluted in complete cell culture medium.
Animals
Porcine peripheral blood was obtained from 6–8 weeks old, healthy large white pigs raised at the Jingpin Farm (Huazhong Agricultural University, Hubei, China). None of the pigs was sacrificed. In order to ameliorate the suffering of the pigs, this experiment was performed in strict accordance with the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals Monitoring Committee of Hubei Province, China, and the protocol was approved by the Committee on the Ethics of Animal Experiments at the College of Veterinary Medicine, Huazhong Agricultural University. The blood and sera derived from pigs were free of S.suis and other pig pathogens.
Isolation of CD14+ monocytes and generation of MoDCs
Peripheral blood samples were collected into 50 mL centrifuge tubes with 0.5% heparin sodium, diluted in a ratio of 1:2 with sterile 1×PBS, overlaid on Ficoll-Hypaque (TBD science, Tianjin, China) and PBMCs were collected as previously detailed [32]. CD14+ monocytes were purified from PBMCs by immunomagnetic labeling of cells using mouse anti-pig CD14 monoclonal antibody (AbD Serotec, Raleigh, NC, USA) and anti-mouse IgG MicroBeads (Miltenyi Biotec, Bergisch-Gladbach, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The CD14+ monocytes were cultured for 5 days in RPMI-1640 medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), 25 ng/mL recombinant porcine IL-4 and 10 ng/ml recombinant porcine GM-CSF (R&D systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA). The cell culture medium was replenished every 3 days. The typical veiled morphology of the cells was checked for every day. After five days of culture, CD1, SLA-II, and CD172a markers on these cells were analyzed by flow cytometry using monoclonal antibodies [33, 34].
Flow cytometric analysis of MoDCs
After the CD14+ monocytes were cultured for 5 days (5-day old MoDCs) as mentioned above, 106 cells were harvested for cytometric analysis.
6-day old MoDC were treated with LPS (1 μg/mL, Sigma Chemical, Poole, Dorset, UK), Pam3CSK4 (500 ng/mL, InvivoGen, San Diego, CA, USA), and SC19 (MOI = 0.1) for 24 h each and then 106 cells from each treatment, along with control cells, were harvested for cytometric analysis.
The cells mentioned above were stained with mouse anti-pig CD1 (Southern Biotech, Cambridge, UK), mouse anti-pig SLA-II (MHC-II, AbD Serotec), mouse anti-porcine CD172a (SWC3, Antigenix America, Huntington Station, NY, USA) and analyzed on a FACSCalibur (BD Biosciences, Hiedelberg, Germany) by using CellQuest Pro software (BD Biosciences).
MoDCs phagocytosis assay
MoDCs (2 × 106 cells/mL) of different ages (2 d, 4 d, 6 d, and 8 d) were seeded into 24-well plates (0.5 mL per well); 0.5 mL of 0.1% neutral red stroke-physiological saline solution was added into each well and the cells were cultured at 37°C with 5% CO2. After 2 h, the cells were washed twice with 1× PBS, following which 0.5 mL/well 1% SDS was added to dissolve the cells. After 2 h at room temperature, OD570nm of the dissolved cells from different wells was detected by using a microplate reader (Bio Teke Corporation, Beijing, China).
Six-day old MoDCs were selected to be infected with pre-opsonized SC19 (MOI = 0.1) and two days later, OD570nm of the dissolved cells was detected by using a microplate reader (Bio Teke).
Proliferation of T cells assay
Five-day old MoDCs were seeded into 24-well plates at 106 cells/mL/well. MoDCs were incubated with SC19 (MOI = 0.001), LPS(1 μg/mL, Sigma) or Pam3CSK4(500 ng/mL, InvivoGen) for 24 h each at 37°C with 5% CO2. Mitomycin C was added into each well at final concentration of 50 μg/mL. MoDCs were washed twice in 1× PBS after 45 min for the subsequent steps.
PBMCs were isolated and seeded in cell culture dishes for 2 h and the suspended cells were collected as T cells. T cells were seeded in 96-well plates at 3×105 cells/mL, 100 μL per well.
The treated MoDCs were added into 96-well plates with T cells in different proportions (1:5, 1:10, 1:100). T cells alone, MoDCs alone and medium alone wells were set as controls. Three days later, 10 μL CCK-8 (Dojindo Laboratories, Japan) was added in each well and further incubated for 5 hours at 37°C with 5% CO2. OD450nm of each well was detected by using a microplate reader. SI (Stimulation Index) was calculated as following:
MoDCs cytokine assay
5-day old MoDCs were stimulated by SC19 (MOI: 0.1, 0.01, 0.001), LPS (1 μg/mL) or Pam3CSK4 (500 ng/mL), at 37°C with 5% CO2. Supernatants were collected after 12 and 24 h of stimulation and analyzed for cytokines (IL-1β, IL-4, IL-6, IL-10, IL-12, TNF-a, IFN-γ, TGF-β, and GM-CSF) using Porcine Cytokine Array according to the manufacturer’s protocol (RayBiotech, Norcross, GA, USA).
Isolation of porcine peripheral blood CD4+T cells
Porcine peripheral blood CD4+T cells were purified from PBMCs by immunomagnetic labeling of cells using mouse anti-pig CD4a monoclonal antibody (AbD Serotec) and anti-mouse IgG MicroBeads (Miltenyi Biotec). Cells were stained with PE mouse anti-pig CD4a (BD Biosciences); after washing, cells were re-suspended in sorting buffer for FACS analysis. Flow cytometry was performed using a FACSCalibur (BD Biosciences), and the purity of CD4+ T cells was demonstrated to be 98%.
Differentiation and cytokine assay
CD4+T cells were mixed with 5-day old MoDCs in the proportion of 4:1. The mixed cells were seeded into 24-well plates at 106 cells/mL/well, and stimulated by SC19 (MOI = 0.1), LPS (1 μg/mL) or Pam3CSK4 (500 ng/mL) at 37°C with 5% CO2.
After stimulation for 12 h, 4 μL of PMA/Ionomycin/BFA/Monensin mixture was added to each well. After 5 hours, supernatant from each well was collected and analyzed for cytokines (IL-4, IL-17, IL-12p70, and IFN-γ) using Human Th1/Th2/Th17 Antibody Array, according to the manufacturer’s protocol (RayBiotech). The collected cells were stained with the following monoclonal antibodies: PE mouse anti-pig CD4a (BD Biosciences), Alexa Fluor®647 mouse anti-pig IFN-γ (BD Biosciences) and mouse anti-bovine interleukin-4: FITC (AbD Serotec).
Statistical analysis
The data were expressed as mean±standard deviations. Data were analyzed using Student’s t-test. P values were derived to assess statistical significance and are indicated in the figure panels. The significance level for all analyses was set to P< 0.05.
Data Availability
All relevant data are within this paper.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by: De-Shi Shi: China National Natural Science Foundation of China (31372484); De-Shi Shi: the Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province of China (2012FFB02906); De-Shi Shi: the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (2015PY117).
References
- 1.King SJ, Heath PJ, Luque I, Tarradas C, Dowson CG, Whatmore AM. Distribution and genetic diversity of suilysin in Streptococcus suis isolated from different diseases of pigs and characterization of the genetic basis of suilysin absence. Infect Immun. 2001; 69: 7572–7582. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Mai NT, Hoa NT, Nga TV, Linh le D, Chau TT, Sinh DX, et al. Streptococcus suis meningitis in adults in Vietnam. Clin Infect Dis. 2008; 46: 659–667. 10.1086/527385 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Ip M, Fung KS, Chi F, Cheuk ES, Chau SS, Wong BW, et al. Streptococcus suis in Hong Kong. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2007; 57: 15–20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Smith HE, Damman M, van der Velde J, Wagenaar F, Wisselink HJ, Stockhofe-Zurwieden N, et al. Identification and characterization of the cps locus of Streptococcus suis serotype 2: the capsule protects against phagocytosis and is an important virulence factor. Infect Immun. 1999; 67: 1750–1756. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Lun ZR, Wang QP, Chen XG, Li AX, Zhu XQ. Streptococcus suis: an emerging zoonotic pathogen. Lancet Infect Dis. 2007; 7: 201–209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Higgins R, Gottschalk M. Distribution of Streptococcus suis capsular types in 1995. Can Vet J. 1996; 37: 242 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Yu H, Jing H, Chen Z, Zheng H, Zhu X, Wang H, et al. Human Streptococcus suis outbreak, Sichuan, China. Emerg Infect Dis. 2006; 12: 914–920. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Feng Y, Zhang H, Wu Z, Wang S, Cao M, Hu D, et al. Wang C. Streptococcus suis infection. Virulence. 2014; 5(4): 477–497. 10.4161/viru.28595 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Bi Y, Li J, Yang L, Zhang S, Li Y, Jia X, et al. Assessment of the pathogenesis of Streptococcus suis type 2 infection in piglets for understanding streptococcal toxic shock-like syndrome, meningitis, and sequelae.Vet Microbiol. 2014;173(3–4):299–309. 10.1016/j.vetmic.2014.08.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Ye C, Zheng H, Zhang J, Jing H, Wang L, Xiong Y, et al. Clinical, experimental, and genomic differences between intermediately pathogenic, highly pathogenic, and epidemic Streptococcus suis.J Infect Dis. 2009;199(1):97–107. 10.1086/594370 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Levin D, Constant S, Pasqualini T, Flavell R, Bottomly K. Role of dendritic cells in the priming of CD4+ T lymphocytes to peptide antigen in vivo. J Immunol. 1993; 151: 6742–6750. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Sallusto F, Schaerli P, Loetscher P, Schaniel C, Lenig D, Mackay CR, et al. Rapid and coordinated switch in chemokine receptor expression during dendritic cell maturation. Eur J Immunol. 1998; 28(9): 2760–2769. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Werling D, Jungi TW. Toll-like receptors linking innate and adative immune response. Vet Immunol Immunopathol. 2003; 91(1): 1–12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Knosp CA, Johnston JA. Regulation of CD4+ T-cell polarization by suppressor of cytokine signalling proteins. Immunology. 2012; 135(2): 101–111. 10.1111/j.1365-2567.2011.03520.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Carrasco CP, Rigden RC, Schaffner R, Gerber H, Neuhaus V, Inumaru S, et al. Porcine dendritic cells generated in vitro: morphological, phenotypic and functional propertises. Immunology. 2001; 104(2): 175–184. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Domínguez-Punaro MC, Segura M, Plante MM, Lacouture S, Rivest S, Gottschalk M. Streptococcus suis serotype 2, an important swine and human pathogen, induces strong systemic and cerebral inflammatory responses in a mouse model of infection. J Immunol. 2007; 179(3): 1842–1854. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Brassard J, Gottschalk M, Quessy S. Cloning and purification of the Streptococcus suis serotype 2 glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase and its involvement as an adhesin. Vet Microbiol. 2004; 102(1–2): 87–94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Gottschalk M, Segura M. The pathogenesis of the meningitis caused by Streptococcus suis: the unresolved questions. Vet Microbiol. 2000; 76(3): 259–272. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.King SJ, Heath PJ, Luque I, Tarradas C, Dowson CG, Whatmore AM. Distribution and genetic diversity of suilysin in Streptococcus suis isolated from different diseases of pigs and characterization of the genetic basis of suilysin absence. Infect Immun. 2001; 69(12): 7572–7582. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Zhang Q, Yang Y, Yan S, Liu J, Xu Z, Yu J, et al. A novel pro-inflammatory protein of Streptococcus suis 2 induces the Toll-like receptor 2-dependent expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines in RAW 264.7 macrophages via activation of ERK1/2 pathway. Front Microbiol. 2015; 6:178 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00178 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Lutz MB, Suri RM, Niimi M, Ogilvie AL, Kukutsch NA, Rössner S, et al. Immature dendritic cells generated with low doses of GM-CSF in the absence of IL-4 are maturation resistant and prolong allograft survival in vivo. Eur Immunol. 2000; 30(7): 1813–1822. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Araki H, Katayama N, Mitani H, Suzuki H, Nishikawa H, Masuya M, et al. Efficient exvivo generation of dendritic cells from CD14+ blood monocytes in the presence of human serum albumin for use in clinical vaccine trails. Br J Haematol. 2001; 114(3): 681–689. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Ezquerra A, Revilla C, Alvarez B, Pérez C, Alonso F, Domínguez J. Porcine myelomonocytic markers and cell populations. Dev Comp Immunol. 2009; 33(3): 284–298. 10.1016/j.dci.2008.06.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Yao Y, Wang LL. Research progress of IL-8. Clin Pediat. 2009; 24(10): 789–792. [Google Scholar]
- 25.Speyer CL, Ward PA. Role of endothelial chemokines and their receptors during inflammation. Invest Surg. 2011; 24(1): 18–27. 10.3109/08941939.2010.521232 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Szabo SJ, Kim ST, Costa GL, Zhang X, Fathman CG, Glimcher LH. A novel transcription factor, T-bet, directs Th1 lineage commitment. Cell. 2000; 100(6): 655–669. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Zhou L, Chong MM, Littman DR. Plasticity of CD4+ T cell lineage differentiation. Immunity. 2009; 30(5): 646–655. 10.1016/j.immuni.2009.05.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Opal SM, DePalo VA. Anti-inflammatory cytokines. Chest. 2000; 117(4): 1162–1172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Asadullah K, Sterry W, Volk HD. Interleukin-10 therapy—review of a new approach. Pharmacol Rev. 2003; 55(2): 241–269. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Liu M, Fang L, Tan C, Long T, Chen H, Xiao S. Understanding Streptococcus suis serotype 2 infection in pigs through a transcriptional approach. BMC Genomics. 2011; 12:253 10.1186/1471-2164-12-253 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Lecours MP, Segura M, Fittipaldi N, Rivest S, Gottschalk M. Immune receptors involved in Streptococcus suis recognition by dendritic cells. PLoS One. 2012; 7(9):e44746 10.1371/journal.pone.0044746 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Silva-Campa E, Flores-Mendoza L, Resendiz M, Pinelli-Saavedra A, Mata-Haro V, Mwangi W, et al. Induction of T helper 3 regulatory cells by dendritic cells infected with porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus. Virology. 2009; 387:373–379. 10.1016/j.virol.2009.02.033 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Wang X, Eaton M, Mayer M, Li H, He D, Nelson E, et al. Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus productively infects monocyte-derived dendritic cells and compromises their anigen-presenting ability. Arch Virol. 2007; 152(2): 289–303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Cecere TE, Meng XJ, Pelzer K, Todd SM, Beach NM, Ni YY, et al. Co-infection of porcine dendritic cells with porcine circovirus type 2a (PCV2a) and genotype II porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) induces CD4(+)CD25(+)FoxP3(+) T cells in vitro. Vet Microbiol. 2012; 160(1–2):233–239. 10.1016/j.vetmic.2012.04.040 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
All relevant data are within this paper.