Table 3.
Correlation Between WSSD and WGAC
|
Build29
|
MGSCv3 w/unplaced
|
||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WSSD | WGAC | Bases | Fraction | Regions | Bases | Fraction | Regions |
| + | + | 4,882,018 | 49% | 46 | 11,437,113 | 16% | 159 |
| — | + | 4,058,785 | 41% | 146 | 6,883,852 | 10% | 531 |
| + | — | 967,960 | 10% | 24 | 53,380,584 | 74% | 786 |
| Total | 9,908,763 | 71,701,549 | |||||
A nonredundant set of duplications detected by WGAC (≤10 kb) was compared against the nonredundant set of duplications detected by WSSD (≤10 kb). The fraction represents the proportion of the duplicated sequence mapped to each of the three categories. A good correlation exists for build29 by these two methods. Most of the duplications in MGSCv3 that were detected only by WSSD mapped to the unknown chromosome and were highly fractured.