Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Prev Sci. 2016 Apr;17(3):367–376. doi: 10.1007/s11121-015-0621-4

Table 2.

LCA fit index each wave

2011 (Wave2)
Model Loglikelihood AIC BIC Adjust BIC BLRT Entroy
1-Class solution –2020.99 4051.97 4075.65 4059.77 N/A N/A
2-Class solution –1778.96 3579.91 3632.01 3597.07 472.37*** 0.79
3-Class solution –1763.41 3560.81 3641.32 3587.33 30.35*** 0.72
4-Class solution –1758.28 3562.56 3671.48 3598.40 10.00 0.71
5-Class solution –1756.01 3570.03 3707.37 3615.27 4.42 0.81
2012 (Wave3)
1-Class solution –1834.48 3678.95 3702.23 3686.35 N/A N/A
2-Class solution –1629.43 3280.86 3332.07 3297.14 400.08*** 0.73
3-Class solution –1606.90 3247.80 3326.95 3272.96 43.96*** 0.79
4-Class solution –1602.05 3250.10 3357.18 3284.14 9.47* 0.81
5-Class solution Not well-identified
2013 (Wave4)
1-Class solution –1593.44 3196.88 3219.67 3203.79 N/A N/A
2-Class solution –1389.71 2801.42 2851.56 2816.63 397.36*** 0.78
3-Class solution –1376.60 2787.21 2864.70 2810.72 25.56* 0.71
4-Class solution –1372.38 2790.76 2895.60 2822.57 8.24 0.75
5-Class solution –1370.04 2798.09 2930.28 2838.20 4.55 0.79

After five classes, the model did not converge. Thus, more than six class-solutions fit really poorly. Model selection was performed before we compared with groping variables (e.g., gender and lifetime interparental violence). That is, these fit statistics refer to an unconstrained model with respect to gender and lifetime interparental violence in LCA

*

p < 0.05

***

p < 0.001