. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Apr 2.

Published in final edited form as: Health Educ Behav. 2015 Aug 17;43(2):208–216. doi: 10.1177/1090198115599397

Table 3.

Random effects coefficients (and standard errors) for cohesion at Week 6 on baseline cohesion, group characteristics, and network nominations (N=165).

	Cohesion Week 6
	Discussion Network	Advice Network	Discussion + Advice Network
Cohesion Week 3	0.548 (0.046)^**	0.564 (0.046)^**	0.558 (0.046)^**
Group Size	0.001 (0.009)	0.007 (0.009)	0.007 (0.009)
Outdegree Week 3	−0.002 (0.023)	−0.021 (0.017)	−0.014 (0.015)
New Ties Week 6	0.071 (0.035)^*	0.033 (0.27)	0.064 (0.025)^**
Interventionist 2	−0.127 (0.069) ^†	−0.114 (0.062)^†	−0.093 (0.058) ^†
R²	0.530	0.529	0.542
Rho	0.059	0.018	0.000

^†

p<0.10;

p<0.05;

^**

p<0.01

NB: Equations also included English language use, adult BMI, adult age, child gender, child age, and child BMI which were all non-significantly associated with cohesion change.

NB2: Bivariate analyses revealed one case in which all six cohesion scale items were scored as one at baseline and 7 at follow-up. This case was removed. Its inclusion causes English to be statistically significantly associated with cohesion change.